Анализ вторичных эффектов и связей между транснациональными корпорациями и местными фирмами

Трансұлттық корпорациялар тікелей шетелдік инвестициялар арқылы жергілікті экономиканың дамуына үлес қосады. Шетелдік зерттеулерде байланыстар мен жанама әсерлерді қалыптастыруға индустриялық экономика мен халықаралық бизнес сияқты теориялық тұрғыдан зерттелінді және өзара байланыстың қабылдаушы елдер мен фирмалардың пайдасына оң әсерін тигізетіні және олардың дамуына үлес қосатынын растады. Мақалада ТҰК пен жергілікті фирмалар арасындағы қарым-қатынас туралы әдебиеттерге шолу жасалынған, сондай-ақ Қазақстандағы ірі француздық трансұлттық корпорацияның еншілес ұйымы мысалға келтіріліп зерттелінген.

1. Belderbos R., Capannelli G., Fukao K. Backward Vertical Linkages of Foreign Manufacturing Affiliates: Evidence from Japanese Multinationals // World Development. – 2001. – № 29. – pp. 189-208.

2. Miozzo M., Yamin M., Ghauri P. Strategy and structure of service multinationals and their impact on linkages with local firms // The Service Industries Journal. – 2012. – № 32. – pp. 1171-1191.

3. UNCTAD. «World Investment Report 2015» // Geneva: UNCTAD [Electronic source]. – 2015. – URL: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2015_en.pdf (accessed: 09.09.2017)

4. UNCTAD. «World Investment Report 2016» //Geneva: UNCTAD [Electronic source]. – 2016. – URL: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2016_en.pdf (accessed: 09.09.2017)

5. UNCTAD. «World Investment Report 2017» // Geneva: UNCTAD [Electronic source]. – 2017. – URL: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2017_en.pdf (accessed: 09.09.2017)

6. Hansen M., Pedersen T., Petersen B. MNC strategies and linkage effects in developing countries // Journal of World Business. – 2009. – № 44. – pp. 121-130.

7. Meyer K. Perspectives on Multinational Enterprises in Emerging Economies // Journal of International Business Studies. – 2004. – № 35. – pp. 259-276.

8. London T., Hart S. Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: beyond the transnational model // Journal of International Business Studies. – 2004. – № 35. – pp. 350-370.

9. Görg H., Greenawa Y. Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? // The World Bank Research Observer. – 2004. – № 19. – pp. 171-197.

10. Giroud A., Scott-Kennel J. MNE linkages in international business: A framework for analysis // International Business Review. – 2009. – № 18. – pp. 555-566.

11. Brannon J., James D., Lucker G. Generating and sustaining backward linkages between maquiladoras and local suppliers in Northern Mexico // World Development. – 1994. – № 22. – pp. 1933-1945.

12. Kelegama S., Foley F. Impediments to Promoting Backward Linkages from the Garment Industry in Sri Lanka // World Development. – 1999. – № 27. – pp. 1445-1460.

13. Barkley D., Mcnamara K. Local Input Linkages: A Comparison of Foreign-owned and Domestic Manufacturers in Georgia and South Carolina // Regional Studies. – 1994. – № 28. – pp. 725-737.

14. Belderbos R., Capannelli G., Fukao K. Backward Vertical Linkages of Foreign Manufacturing Affiliates: Evidence from Japanese Multinationals // World Development. – 2001. – № 29. – pp. 189-208.

15. Lall S. Vertical inter-firm linkages in LDCs: An empirical study // Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. – 1980. – № 42 (3). – pp. 203-226.

16. Wang F. Identification of MNC knowledge resources for the local market: an examination of 7 Eleven's international licensing operations // The International Review of Retail. Distribution and Consumer Research. – 2009. – № 19. – pp. 535-551.

17. Park B., Ghauri P. Key factors affecting acquisition of technological capabilities from foreign acquiring firms by small and medium sized local firms // Journal of World Business. – 2011. – № 46. – pp. 116-125.

18. Noor H., Clarke R., Driffield N. Multinational Enterprises and Technological Effort by Local Firms: A Case Study of the Malaysian Electronics and Electrical Industry // The Journal of Development Studies. – 2002. – № 38. – pp. 129-141.

19. Crespo N., Fontoura M. Determinant factors of FDI spillovers – what do we really know? // World Development. – 2007. – № 35. – pp. 410-425.

20. Blomstrom M., Kokko A. The Impact of Foreign Investment on Host Countries: A Review of the Empirical Evidence // BANK. W. (ed.). – 1996.

21. Ha Y., Giroud A. Competence-creating subsidiaries and FDI technology spillovers // International Business Review. – 2016. – № 24. – pp. 605-614.

22. Perri A., Andersson U., Nell P., Santangelo G. Balancing the trade-off between learning prospects and spillover risks: MNC subsidiaries’ vertical linkage patterns in developed countries // Journal of World Business. – 2013. – № 48. – pp. 503-514.

23. Newman C., Rand J., Talbot T., Tarp F. Technology transfers foreign investment and productivity spillovers // European Economic Review. – 2015. – № 76. – pp. 168-187.

24. Harris R., Robinson C. Productivity Impacts and Spillovers from Foreign Ownership in the United Kingdom // National Institute Economic Review. – 2004. – № 187. – pp. 58-75.

25. Aitken. B., Harrison A. Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela // The American Economic Review. – 1999. – № 89. – pp. 605-618.

26. Haddad M., Harrison A. Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco // Journal of Development Economics. – 1993. – № 42. – pp. 51-74.

27. Firth R., Ghauri P. Multinational enterprise acquisitions in emerging markets: linkage effects on local firms // European Journal of International Management. – 2010. – № 4. – pp. 135-162.

28. Официальный вэб сайт копании [Электрон. ресурс]. – URL: http://www.danone.com/en/ (дата обращения: 02.10.2017)

29. Внутренняя документация компании ТОО «Danone Berkut».