Preview

Central Asian Economic Review

Advanced search

Competitive advantages of the Almaty Aountain Aluster in the development of ski tourism

https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2025-4-116-132

Abstract

Research aim. The aim of the research is to identify and evaluate the distinctive competitive advantages of ski tourism within Kazakhstan’s Almaty Aountain Aluster (AMC), and determine how these advantages can be strategically leveraged to enhance sustainable regional tourism development.

Research Methodology. The study employs a mixed-method approach, integrating Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based spatial analysis, comparative benchmarking against established ski destinations (French Alps and Georgian ski clusters), and economic impact assessments based on secondary data from governmental and international sources. GIS methodologies included data extraction via Python from open-source geospatial databases (2GIS, OpenStreetMap), proximity analysis, and infrastructure density visualization.

Value of the study. This research is significant as it provides a comprehensive comparative spatial and economic analysis of AMC, a strategically crucial yet relatively understudied ski tourism destination. The combination of advanced GIS analytical tools and comparative benchmarking delivers practical insights and robust strategic recommendations, uniquely tailored to the sustainable tourism development needs of Kazakhstan.

Research findings. The study identified AMC’s core competitive strengths, including its accessibility, affordability, unique cultural and ecological assets, and governmental support. At the same time, the study reveals significant infrastructure scarcities in hospitality, gastronomic services, and complementary tourist facilities were evident. Comparative analysis with Georgian and French counterparts underscored AMC’s critical need to substantially expand its infrastructure, recommending the construction of 30-40 new accommodations, 60-70 restaurants, and approximately 20-30 complementary service facilities. Strategic infrastructure development aligned with sustainable tourism practices is projected to notably enhance AMC’s tourism capacity and its contribution to Kazakhstan’s GDP by an estimated 0.5%-1.5% annually by 2027.

About the Authors

A. A. Adbanova
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan

Adbanova Aizhan Armanovna – PhD Student

Almaty



Zh. N. Aliyeva
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan

Aliyeva Zhannat Narikbayevna – сandidate of geographical sciences, associate professor

Almaty



E. S. Boribay
Narxoz University
Kazakhstan

Elmira Boribay – сandidate of biological sciences, associate professor

Almaty



References

1. Hudson, S., & Shephard, G. (1998). Measuring service quality at tourism destinations: An application of importance-performance analysis to an alpine ski resort. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 7(3), 61–77.

2. Kazakhstan Government Report. (2023). Strategic Development Plan of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2025. Nur-Sultan: Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

3. Paulino, F., Lozano, J., & Prats, L. (2023). A network-based approach for delimiting tourist destinations in nature-based tourism. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 41, Article 100613.

4. Zharkenova, S., Tazhibayeva, M., & Amreyev, M. (2023). Branding of tourist cluster systems: Case of Almaty. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 43(3), 1091–1098.

5. Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2014). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy, 43(10), 1785–1799.

6. Swann, G. M. P., Prevezer, M., & Stout, D. (1998). The dynamics of industrial clustering: International comparisons in computing and biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

7. Scholz, R. W., von der Heiden, M., & Marz, S. (2012). Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: Historical framework and theory building. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 21(2), 108–114.

8. Elsner, W. (2010). The process and a simple logic of ‘meso’: On the co-evolution of institutions and platform size – theoretical basics and policy implications. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(3), 445–477.

9. Jørgensen, F. (2017). Cluster policy and regional development: Scale, scope and renewal. Regional Studies, 51(2), 217–228.

10. Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2022). Almaty–Bishkek Economic Corridor Tourism Development Plan. Manila: ADB.

11. Turgen Investment Proposal. (2023). Development of mountain resort infrastructure in Turgen Gorge. Almaty: Kazakh Tourism.

12. Duarte-Duarte, M., Talero-Sarmiento, L. C., & Rodríguez-Padilla, C. M. (2021). Clustering and tourist routes: A methodological proposal using the Gower similarity coefficient. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(17), 2506–2521.

13. Pashentsev, D. A., & Garmider, I. V. (2020). Methodological approaches to cluster analysis in tourism. Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 5(118), 357–361.

14. Pre-feasibility Study on Turgen Mountain Resort. (2021). Pre-feasibility study on Turgen mountain resort. Almaty: Kazakh Tourism and Kazakh Invest.

15. Georgian National Tourism Administration. (2023). Statistical yearbook of tourism in Georgia, 2023. Tbilisi: GNTA.

16. Atout France. (2023). Les chiffres clés du tourisme 2022–2023. Paris: Agence de développement touristique de la France.


Review

For citations:


Adbanova A.A., Aliyeva Zh.N., Boribay E.S. Competitive advantages of the Almaty Aountain Aluster in the development of ski tourism. Central Asian Economic Review. 2025;(4):116-132. https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2025-4-116-132

Views: 11


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2789-4398 (Print)
ISSN 2789-4401 (Online)