MODERN MIGRATION THEORY: CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES
Abstract
The purpose of our research is international migration theorists to pay special attention to because it is based on a «nation".
The methodological basis of the work is based on general principles and methods of scientific knowledge.
The results of the study are that modern migration theories acknowledge the existence of different migratory flows, explore immigration and emigration in large systems and networks, and are capable of theoretically considering movement, mobility, and their effects.
Extensive research is needed to understand migration processes and all approaches must be taken into account.
About the Authors
A. Dzhunussov
Narxoz University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Almaty
S. Yessetova
Eurasian Center for Economic and Legal Research
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Almaty
B. Begassilov
Narxoz University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Almaty
References
1. O'Reilly. K. Migration theories: a critical overview. - Oxford: Routledge. - 2015. - pp. 25-33.
2. Arango J. International migration in the new millennium: global movement and settlement. - Aldershot; Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate. – 2004. - pp. 15-35.
3. Wimmer A., Schiller N.G., 2002. Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation- State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), pp. 301-334.
4. Kivisto P. 2001. Theorizing Transnational Immigration: A Critical Review of Current Efforts. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), pp. 549-577.
5. Ravenstein E.G. The Laws of Migration. - New York: Arno Press, 1976.
6. Chiswick B. Are Immigrants Favourably Self-Selected? Migration theory: talking across disciplines. 2nd edn. London: Routledge,. – 2008. - pp. 61-76.
7. Cohen R. Migration and its enemies: global capital, migrant labour and the nation-state. Aldershot: Ashgate. 2006.
8. Martin P.L., 2004. The United States: Benign Neglect Toward Immigration. In: W.A. Cornelius, P.L. Martin and J.F. Hollifield, eds, Controlling Immigration. A Global Perspective.pp. 83-99. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, pp.83-99
9. Wallerstein I.M., 1974. The modern world system. New York; London: Academic Press.
10. Portes A., Walton J., 1981. Labor, class and the international system. New York ; London: Academic Press
11. Castles S., Miller M.J., 2009. The age of migration: international population movements in the modern world. 4th edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Kiy R., Mcenany A., Civic engagement, volunteerism, and charitable giving: Americans retired in Mexican Coastal Communities. National City, CA: International Community Foundation. 2010.
13. Bagby I., 2009. The American Mosque in Transition: Assimilation, Acculturation and Isolation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(3), 473-490.
14. Portes A. and ZHOU, M., 1993. The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants. 530, pp. 74-96.
15. Massey D.S., Arango J., Hugo G., Kouaouci A., Pellegrino A., Edward Taylor J., 1998. Worlds in motion: understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Portes A., 2010. Migration and Social Change: Some Conceptual Reflections. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), pp. 1537-1563.
17. O'Reilly K., Stones R, Botterill K. (2104) Lifestyle migration in East Asia: Integrating ethnographic methodology and practice theory' in Sage Research Methods Cases, Sage Publications Ltd (viewed 29/07/14), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/978144627305013509192
18. Giddens A., 1984. The constitution of society : outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity
19. Stones R., 2005. Structuration theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. URRY, J., 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
Review
For citations:
Dzhunussov A., Yessetova S., Begassilov B. MODERN MIGRATION THEORY: CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES. Central Asian Economic Review. 2019;(5):8-15. (In Kazakh)
Views:
401
Email this article 