ЭКОНОМИКА КОНФЛИКТОВ: КОНТЕКСТ И КОРЕННЫЕ ПРИЧИНЫ МЕЖОБЩИННЫХ СТОЛКНОВЕНИЙ В КАЗАХСТАНЕ

Цель исследования. Целью данной статьи является исследование обоснованности экономических теорий конфликта для объяснения коренных причин межобщинных столкновений в Казахстане.

Методология. Такой теоретический обзор и качественный методологический подход дают более детальную картину и представляют собой начальный шаг в разработке стратегии деэскалации с учетом локального контекста.

Оригинальность / ценность исследования. Благодаря углубленному изучению Кордайского конфликта в 2020 году наша статья опровергает исследования, которые объясняют корни межобщинного конфликта сохранившимся советским наследием и языковой политикой. В этой литературе поводы для недовольства общин объясняются политикой идентичности и/или нарушением коллективных прав, и воспринимаются как нечто само собой разумеющееся. Они концентрируются на дискурсе. Вместо этого, в этой статье исследуется применимость экономических теорий «жадности» и «относительной депривации» в контексте конфликтов в Казахстане.

Результаты исследования. Используя результаты наших полевых исследований в Кордае, поддержанных исследовательским проектом Министерства науки и высшего образования Республики Казахстан, мы показываем, что экономические теории «жадности» объясняют хищнический контекст на локальном уровне, а теория «относительной депривации» отражает восприятие местного населения. Сочетание этих двух условий создало благодатную почву для коллективного недовольства и послужило первопричиной конфликтов.

1. Lim V. Interethnic Conflicts in Kazakhstan: Causes and Context // CABAR. – 2021. – June 29. Available at: https://cabar.asia/en/interethnic-conflicts-in-kazakhstan-causes-and-context

2. Sabytkhanova M., Kozhakhmet S. Evaluation of Human Resource Management Research in Post-Soviet Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis // Central Asian Economic Review. – 2023. – 3. – P. 6-18. https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2023-3-6-18

3. Doldina A.N. The Banking Sector of Kazakhstan: Problems and Prospects // Central Asian Economic Review – 2018. – 5(6). – P. 108-115. (In Russ.)

4. Mussin B.M., Nurlan E. 2023. Development of Nuclear Energy in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Issues and Trends // Central Asian Economic Review– 2023. – 1. – P. 47-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2023-1-47-59.

5. Bazhkenova G. Korday: Pol Goda Spustya. 2020. 3, December). [Video] YouTube. https://youtu.be/i99woBI-DI4

6. Mauletbay S. Чтобы мы жили мирно, надо, чтобы законы работали одинаково для всех". Репортаж из Кордайского района. 2020. 11 February. Available at: <https://informburo.kz/stati/chtoby-my-zhili-mirno-nado-chtoby-zakony-rabotali-odinakovo-dlya-vseh-reportazh-iz-kordayskogo-rayona.html

7. Trotsenko P. Как живут казахи и дунгане после беспорядков. (2020, 2 March). // https://rus.azattyq.org/a/kazakhstan-masanchi-karakemer-kazakh-dungan-report/30463465.html

8. ADC Memorial. The Korday Pogrom: The Dungan People of Kazakhstan Seek Justice // ADC Memorial. (2020, 19 May). https://adcmemorial.org/en/articles/kordaypogrom/.

9. EurAsia Daily. ордайский разлом: власти Казахстана рискуют потерять контроль над страной. https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2020/05/02/kordayskiy-razlom-vlasti-kazahstana-riskuyut-poteryat-kontrol-nadstranoy

10. Smagul B. “Қордайдағы қазақ пен дұңған арасындағы мəселелер.” // Facebook. 2020, 7 February. https://www.facebook.com/BSmagul/posts/197780378254318

11. Kashibay M. “Қордай оқиғасы "ұлтаралық қақтығыс" па?” // Qamshy.kz. 2020a, 12 January. https://qamshy.kz/article/55264-qorday-oqighasy-ultaralyq-qaqtyghys-pa

12. Kashibay M. “Qamshy.kz тілшісі этникалық дүнгендер ұрып-соққан қарияның ұлымен сөйлесті.” // Qamshy.kz. 2020b, 8 January. https://qamshy.kz/article/55186-qamshykz-tilshisi-etnikalyq-dungender-uryp-soqqan-qariyanynh-ulymen-soylesti

13. Tutumlu A. and Imyarova Z. Pogroms in Post-Nazarbayev Kazakhstan: From Perceptions to Violent Practice // OXUS Society for Central Asia Affairs, 2023. https://oxussociety.org/

14. GoffK. Nested Nationalism: Making and Unmaking Nations in the Soviet Caucasus. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, (2021). – 336 p.

15. Tutumlu A. and Imyarova Z. The Kazakhstani Soviet not? Reading Nazarbayev’s Kazakhstani-ness through Brezhnev’s Soviet people // Central Asian Survey, – 2021. – 40(3). – P. 400-419. DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2021.1926924

16. Imyarova Z. (2022). Balancing between Majorities: Notes on Osh Dungans // Central Asian Survey, – 2022. – 41(3). – P. 402-418. doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2021.2013773

17. Tutumlu A., Imyarova Z. and Meldibekova Z. Desovietizing Nation-Building in Kazakhstan: Case of 2020 Korday Violence // Bulletin of Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, – 2023. – 78(3). – P. 23-31. DOI: http://doi.org/10.51889/2959-6017.2023.78.3.003

18. Kudaibergenova D. Compartmentalized Ideology: Presidential Addresses and Legitimation in Kazakhstan. In R. Isaacs and A. Frigerio (Eds.), Theorizing Central Asian Politics: The State, Ideology and Power (2019). (pp.145–166). – Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

19. Sharipova D., Bukhanov, A., and Alpeissova, A. The Determinants of Civic and Ethnic Nationalisms in Kazakhstan: Evidence from the Grass-Roots Level // Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, – 2017. – 23(2). – P. 203-226, DOI: 10.1080/13537113.2017.1311143

20. Brubaker R. Nationalizing states revisited: projects and processes of nationalization in post-Soviet states // Ethnic and Racial Studies, – 2011. – 34(11). – P. 1785-1814, DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2011.579137

21. Helf G. Looking for Trouble: Sources of Violent Conflict in Central Asia. [Special Report, 18 November]. Washington DC // US Institute of Peace, - 2020. https://www.usip.org/publications/2020/11/looking-trouble-sources-violent-conflict-central-asia

22. Junisbai B. and Junisbai A. Are Youth Different? The Nazarbayev Generation and Public Opinion. In M. Laruelle (Ed.), The Nazarbayev Generation: Youth in Kazakhstan, (pp. 25-48). – Lexington Books (2019).

23. Laruelle M. Introduction: The Nazarbayev Generation: The Sociological Portrait. In M. Laruelle (Ed.), The Nazarbayev Generation: Youth in Kazakhstan (pp. 1-22). – London: Lexington Books. (2019).

24. Aitymbetov N., E. Toktarov, and Y. Ormakhanova. (2015). Nation-Building in Kazakhstan: Kazakh and Kazakhstani Identities Controversy” // Bilig, – 2015. – 74. P. – 1–20.

25. Asanova J. Seeing near and far: Balancing stakeholder needs and rights in Kazakhstan’s educational reform // Canadian and International Education, – 2007. – 36(2). – P. 71–90.

26. Diener A. (2002). National Territory and the Reconstruction of History in Kazakhstan // Eurasian Geography and Economics, – 2002. – 43(8). – P. 632–650.

27. Theroux P. Hating the Asians // Transition, – 1997 – 75(76). – P. 60–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2935390

28. Xu Z. and Sun, B. (2019). Influential mechanism of farmers' sense of relative deprivation in the sustainable development of rural tourism // Journal of Sustainable Tourism, – 2019. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1675675

29. Tursyngaliyeva, G., Sagindykov, K., Konyrkhanova, A., Niyazova, R. and Sydykova, A. Modeling the dynamical ethnic processes in multinational society // Journal of Modelling in Management, – 2021. . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-11-2020-0308

30. Collier P. Rebellion as a Quasi-Criminal Activity // The Journal of Conflict Resolution, – 2000. – 44(6). – P. 839-853.

31. Collier P. Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. Washington DC. – 2003: World Bank Group.

32. Collier P. and Hoeffler, A. (2005). Resource Rents, Governance, and Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 625-633.

33. Englebert P. (2000). Pre-Colonial Institutions, Post-Colonial States, and Economic Development in Tropical Africa // Political Research Quarterly, – 2000. – 7(36). – P. 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290005300101

34. Keen, D. Incentives and Disincentives for Violence. In Berdal M. and Malone D (Eds.), Greed & Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars (pp. 17-42). USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc. 2000

35. Englebert P. and Hummel R. (2005). Let’s Stick Together: Understanding Africa’s Secessionist Deficit // African Affairs, – 2005. – 104(416). – P. 399–427.

36. O'Donnell Guillermo. On the State, Development, and some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Some Glances at some Post-Communist Countries // World Development – 1993. – 21. – P. 1355-1369.

37. Hale, H. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. – 2015. – Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press. 542 p.

38. Tutumlu A. Governmentalization of Kazakhstani State: Between Governmentality and Neopatrimonial Capitalism. In Isaacs, R. and Frigerio, A. (Eds.), Theorizing Central Asian Politics: The State, Ideology and Power (pp. 43-64), – 2018. – Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

39. Shkel, S. Neo-patrimonial practices and sustainability of authoritarian regimes in Eurasia // Communist and Post-Communist Studies, – 2019. – 2(2). – P. 169–176.

40. Satpayev D. Deformatsiya Vertikali: ot ‘Anonimnyh Imperii’ do Antilobbi [Vertical Deformation: from ‘Anonymous Empires’ to Antilobby] (in Russian). – 2019. – Almaty: SOZ. 790 р.

41. Ross, M. L. (2011). Will oil drown the Arab Spring: Democracy and the resource curse // Foreign Aff., – 2011. – 90(2).

42. De Soysa I. The Resource Curse: Are Civil Wars Driven by Rapacity or Paucity? In Berdal M. and Malone D (Eds.), Greed & Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars (pp. 113-136). USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc. 2000.

43. Murshed S. M. and Tadjoeddin, M. Z. Revisiting the greed and grievance explanations for violent internal conflict // Journal of International Development, – 2009. – 21(87). – P. 87–111.

44. Meuleman B., Davidov E. and Billiet J. (2009). Changing Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe, 2002-2007: A Dynamic Group Conflict Theory Approach // Social Science Research, – 2009. – 38. – P.352– 365.

45. Nathan N. The Scarce State Inequality and Political Power in the Hinterland. London: – 2023. – Cambridge University Press. 310 p.

46. Bobo L. Whites’ Opposition to Busing: Symbolic Racism or Realistic Group Conflict? // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, – 1983. – 45(6). – P. 1196–1210.

47. O’Rourke K. H., and Sinnott R. The Determinants of Individual Attitudes Towards Immigration // European Journal of Political Economy, – 2006. – 22. – P. 838–861.

48. Sides, J., and Citrin, J. European Opinion About Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information // British Journal of Political Science, – 2007. – 37(3). – P. 477–504.

49. Meuleman B., Abts K., Schmidt P., Pettigrew, Th. and Davidov, E. Economic conditions, group relative deprivation and ethnic threat perceptions: a cross-national perspective // Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550157

50. Cook, Th. D., Crosby, F., and Hennigan, K. The Construct Validity of Relative Deprivation. In Suls, M. and Miller, R. (Eds.), Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (pp. 307–333). Hemisphere. 1977

51. Vermeersch P. Theories of ethnic mobilization: overview and recent trends. CRPD Working Paper No. 3. Leuven: University of Leuven. 2011.

52. Collins, K. Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia: The Impact on Regime Transformation. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2006. 376 p.