SYSTEM OF MANAGEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES: EVOLUTION AND APPROACHES AT THE MODERN STAGE

Purpose of research. Effective R&D management is critical in the framework of transition to a knowledgebased economy, thus it is not only about the size of the R&D budget and the percentage of R&D expenditures, but also about the management of innovation activities in general. The article analyzes the evolution of management of knowledge-intensive industries and its features at each stage of development.

Methodology. It was used a systematic analysis and structuring of scientific information; deduction method for determining the methodological foundations of foreign experience about system of management of knowledge-intensive industries.

Originality / value of research. The study includes literature review on this issue which issue made it possible to highlight the main approaches to the management of knowledge-intensive industries in the context of Industry 4.0. It was given information about models of R&D management by generations and their features.

Findings. The article presents the author's scheme of the system of management of knowledge-intensive industries and its components based on the open innovation approach, as well as the mechanisms of cooperation and communication "science-industry", which can be used in the formation of state programs for the development of science in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

1. Nacional'nyj Plan razvitiya Respubliki Kazahstan do 2025, utverzhdennyj Ukazom Prezidenta Respubliki Kazahstan ot 15 fevralya 2018 goda № 636. (2018). Official information resource of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved October 30, 2021, from https://primeminister.kz/ru/documents/gosprograms/stratplan-2025 (In Russian).

2. OECD. (2001). The Wellbeing of Nations: The Role of Human and Capital. Center for Education Research and Innovation, OECD, Paris, 118 p.

3. World Development Report 1998/1999: Knowledge for Development (1998). World Bank Group website. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved October 30, 2021, from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5981.

4. International Monetary Fund. Research Dept. (Eds.). (2007). World Economic Outlook, October 2007: Globalization and Inequality. IMF, Washington, 276 p.

5. Machlup, F. (1973). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 436 p.

6. Yinnon, A. T. (1996). The shift to knowledge-intensive production in the plastics-processing industry and its implications for infrastructure development: three case studies – New York State, England and Israel. Research Policy, 25(1), 163-179.

7. Freeman, C. C. and Perez, C. (1988). Structural crisis of adjustment, business cycles and investment behavior. In Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, London, 39-62.

8. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum, Geneva, 184 p.

9. Zhao, R. (2003). Transition in R&D management control system: Case study of biotechnology research institute in China. Journal of technology management research, 14(2), 213-229.

10. Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy, 8, 102-153.

11. Blomqvist, K., Hara, V., Koivuniemi, J. and Aijo, T. (2004). Towards networked R&D management: The R&D approach of Sonera Corporation as an example. R&D Management, 34(5), 591-603.

12. Roome, N. (1994). Business strategy, R&D management and environmental imperatives. R&D Management, 24, 65-81.

13. Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7-31.

14. Rogers, D. M. A. (1996). The challenge of fifth generation R&D. Research Technology Management, 39(4), 33-41.

15. Niosi, J. (1999). Fourth-generation R&D: From linear model to flexible innovation. Journal of business research, 45, 111-117.

16. Sofo, F. (2008). Reflections on China and a six-dimensional framework for managing research and development. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 1(1), 28-42.

17. Archibugi, D. and Michie, J. (1995). Technology and innovation: an introduction. Journal of Economics, 19(1), 1-4.

18. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, USA, Harvard Business School Press, 272 p.

19. Fasnacht, D. (2018). Open innovation ecosystems. In book: Open Innovation Ecosystems, 2 Edition, Chapter 5, Springer, 131-172, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76394-1_5.

20. Miles, R. (2007). Innovation and Leadership Values. California Management Review, 50(1), 192-201.

21. Rust, F. C. (2015). Requirements for a Systems-Based Research and Development Management Process in Transport Infrastructure Engineering. The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(1), 86-101.

22. Satybaldina A. A. (Eds.). (2019). Konceptual'naya model' upravleniya i organizacii nauki Respubliki Kazahstan. Institut ekonomiki KN MON RK, Almaty, 60 p. (In Russian).

23. Agrawal, A. (2001). University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 285-302.

24. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.

25. Meyer-Krahmer, F. and Schmoch, U. (1998). Sciencebased technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27, 835-851.

26. Perkman, M. and Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280.

27. Nambisan, S. and Sawhney, M. (2007). A buyer’s guide to the innovation bazaar. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 109-118.

28. Nishimura, J. and Okamuro, H. (2011). Subsidy and Networking: The Effect of Direct and Indirect Support Programmes of Cluster Policy. Research Policy, 40(5), 714-727.

29. Dodgson, M., Gann, D. and Slater, A. (2006). The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Proctor & Gamble. R&D Management, 36(3), 333–346.

30. Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., Hareesh Govindarajan, U., Chuang, A. C. and Sun, J. J. (2016). A Review of Essential Standards and Patent Landscapes for the Internet of Things: A Key Enabler for Industry 4.0. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 33, 208-229, DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2016.11.007.

31. Ilina, I., Zharova, E., Turginbayeva, A., Agamirova, E. and Kamenskiy, A. (2019). Network platform of commercializing the results of R&D. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(01), 2647-2657.