caerCentral Asian Economic ReviewCentral Asian Economic Review2789-43982789-4401Университет Нархоз10.52821/2789-4401-2022-1-6-16caer-390Research ArticleНАЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА: ВЕКТОРЫ РАЗВИТИЯNATIONAL ECONOMY: DEVELOPMENT VECTORSСИСТЕМА УПРАВЛЕНИЯ НАУКОЕМКИМИ ПРОИЗВОДСТВАМИ: ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ И ПОДХОДЫ НА СОВРЕМЕННОМ ЭТАПЕSYSTEM OF MANAGEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES: EVOLUTION AND APPROACHES AT THE MODERN STAGEЖайсановаД. С.ZhaisanovaD. S.

Жайсанова Динара Сайлауовна – докторант PhD

Алматы

Almaty

zhaisanova15@gmail.comЖупароваА. С.ZhuparovaA. S.

Жупарова Азиза Сериковна – PhD, ассоциированный профессор

Алматы

Almaty

aziza_z@mail.ruКазахский национальный университет имени аль-ФарабиКазахстанAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityKazakhstan20222705202201616Copyright © Жайсанова Д.С., Жупарова А.С., 20222022Жайсанова Д.С., Жупарова А.С.Zhaisanova D.S., Zhuparova A.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://caer.narxoz.kz/jour/article/view/390

Цель исследования – в рамках перехода в наукоемкую экономику решающее значение имеет эффективное управление научно-исследовательскими и опытно-конструкторскими работами (НИОКР), поскольку речь идет не только о размере бюджета на НИОКР и процентном соотношении расходов на НИОКР, но и об управлении инновационной деятельностью в целом. В статье анализируется эволюция управления наукоемкими производствами и ее особенности на каждом этапе развития.

Методология исследования

Методология исследования. В статье использован системный анализ и структурирования научной информации; метод дедукции для определения методологических основ системы управления наукоемкими производствами в зарубежной практике.

Оригинальность / ценность исследования – изучение зарубежной литературы по данному вопросу позволило выделить основные подходы управления наукоемкими производствами в контексте Индустрии 4.0. Приведены модели управления НИОКР по поколениям и их особенности.

Результаты исследования

Результаты исследования. В статье представлена авторская схема системы управления наукоемкими производствами и ее компонентов на основе подхода открытых инноваций, а также механизмы сотрудничества и связи «наука-производство», которые можно применять при формировании государственных программ по развитию науки в Республике Казахстан.

Purpose of research

Purpose of research. Effective R&D management is critical in the framework of transition to a knowledgebased economy, thus it is not only about the size of the R&D budget and the percentage of R&D expenditures, but also about the management of innovation activities in general. The article analyzes the evolution of management of knowledge-intensive industries and its features at each stage of development.

Methodology

Methodology. It was used a systematic analysis and structuring of scientific information; deduction method for determining the methodological foundations of foreign experience about system of management of knowledge-intensive industries.

Originality / value of research. The study includes literature review on this issue which issue made it possible to highlight the main approaches to the management of knowledge-intensive industries in the context of Industry 4.0. It was given information about models of R&D management by generations and their features.

Findings

Findings. The article presents the author's scheme of the system of management of knowledge-intensive industries and its components based on the open innovation approach, as well as the mechanisms of cooperation and communication "science-industry", which can be used in the formation of state programs for the development of science in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

НИОКРуправление наукоемкими производствамиоткрытые инновацииИндустрия 4.0R&Dmanagement of knowledge-intensive industriesopen innovationIndustry 4.0ReferencesНациональный План развития Республики Казахстан до 2025, утвержденный Указом Президента Республики Казахстан от 15 февраля 2018 года № 636 [Электронный ресурс] // Официальный информационный ресурс Премьер-Министра Республики Казахстан [web-сайт]. – URL: https://primeminister.kz/ru/documents/gosprograms/stratplan-2025 (Дата обращения: 30.10.2021).Nacional'nyj Plan razvitiya Respubliki Kazahstan do 2025, utverzhdennyj Ukazom Prezidenta Respubliki Kazahstan ot 15 fevralya 2018 goda № 636. (2018). Official information resource of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved October 30, 2021, from https://primeminister.kz/ru/documents/gosprograms/stratplan-2025 (In Russian).OECD. The Wellbeing of Nations: The Role of Human and Capital. – Center for Education Research and Innovation, OECD, Paris, 2001. – 118 p.OECD. (2001). The Wellbeing of Nations: The Role of Human and Capital. Center for Education Research and Innovation, OECD, Paris, 118 p.World Development Report 1998/1999: Knowledge for Development [Электронный ресурс] // World Bank Group [web-сайт]. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. – URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5981 (Дата обращения: 30.10.2021).World Development Report 1998/1999: Knowledge for Development (1998). World Bank Group website. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved October 30, 2021, from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5981.World Economic Outlook, October 2007: Globalization and Inequality / International Monetary Fund. Research Dept. – IMF, Washington, 2007. – 276 p.International Monetary Fund. Research Dept. (Eds.). (2007). World Economic Outlook, October 2007: Globalization and Inequality. IMF, Washington, 276 p.Machlup F. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. – Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1973. – 436 p.Machlup, F. (1973). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 436 p.Yinnon A. T. The shift to knowledge-intensive production in the plastics-processing industry and its implications for infrastructure development: three case studies – New York State, England and Israel // Research Policy. – 1996. – № 25(1). – P. 163-179.Yinnon, A. T. (1996). The shift to knowledge-intensive production in the plastics-processing industry and its implications for infrastructure development: three case studies – New York State, England and Israel. Research Policy, 25(1), 163-179.Freeman C. C., Perez C. Structural crisis of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour // In Technical change and economic theory / eds. G. Dosi. –Pinter, London, 1988. – P. 39-62.Freeman, C. C. and Perez, C. (1988). Structural crisis of adjustment, business cycles and investment behavior. In Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, London, 39-62.Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution. – Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2016. – 184 p.Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum, Geneva, 184 p.Zhao R. Transition in R&D management control system: Case study of biotechnology research institute in China // Journal of technology management research. – 2003. – № 14(2). – P. 213-229.Zhao, R. (2003). Transition in R&D management control system: Case study of biotechnology research institute in China. Journal of technology management research, 14(2), 213-229.Mowery D., Rosenberg N. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies // Research Policy. – 1979. – Vol. 8. – P. 102-153.Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy, 8, 102-153.Blomqvist K., Hara V., Koivuniemi J., Aijo T. Towards networked R&D management: The R&D approach of Sonera Corporation as an example // R&D Management. – 2004. – № 34(5). – P. 591-603.Blomqvist, K., Hara, V., Koivuniemi, J. and Aijo, T. (2004). Towards networked R&D management: The R&D approach of Sonera Corporation as an example. R&D Management, 34(5), 591-603.Roome N. Business strategy, R&D management and environmental imperatives // R&D Management. – 1994. – Vol. 24. – P. 65-81.Roome, N. (1994). Business strategy, R&D management and environmental imperatives. R&D Management, 24, 65-81.Rothwell R. Towards the fifth-generation innovation process // International Marketing Review. – 1994. – № 11(1). – P. 7-31.Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7-31.Rogers D. M. A. The challenge of fifth generation R&D // Research Technology Management. – 1996. – № 39(4). – P. 33-41.Rogers, D. M. A. (1996). The challenge of fifth generation R&D. Research Technology Management, 39(4), 33-41.Niosi J. Fourth-generation R&D: From linear model to flexible innovation // Journal of business research. – 1999. – № 45. – P. 111-117.Niosi, J. (1999). Fourth-generation R&D: From linear model to flexible innovation. Journal of business research, 45, 111-117.Sofo F. Reflections on China and a six-dimensional framework for managing research and development // Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China. – 2008. – № 1(1). – P. 28-42.Sofo, F. (2008). Reflections on China and a six-dimensional framework for managing research and development. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 1(1), 28-42.Archibugi D., Michie J. Technology and innovation: an introduction // Journal of Economics. – 1995. – № 19(1). – P. 1-4.Archibugi, D. and Michie, J. (1995). Technology and innovation: an introduction. Journal of Economics, 19(1), 1-4.Chesbrough H. W. Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. – Harvard Business School Press: Boston, USA, 2003. – 272 p.Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, USA, Harvard Business School Press, 272 p.Fasnacht D. Open innovation ecosystems // In book: Open Innovation Ecosystems. – 2 Edition. – Chapter 5. – Springer, 2018. – P. 131-172. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76394-1_5.Fasnacht, D. (2018). Open innovation ecosystems. In book: Open Innovation Ecosystems, 2 Edition, Chapter 5, Springer, 131-172, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76394-1_5.Miles R. Innovation and Leadership Values // California Management Review. – 2007. – № 50(1). – P. 192-201.Miles, R. (2007). Innovation and Leadership Values. California Management Review, 50(1), 192-201.Rust F. C. Requirements for a Systems-Based Research and Development Management Process in Transport Infrastructure Engineering // The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering. – 2015. – № 26(1). – P. 86-101.Rust, F. C. (2015). Requirements for a Systems-Based Research and Development Management Process in Transport Infrastructure Engineering. The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(1), 86-101.Концептуальная модель управления и организации науки Республики Казахстан / Под руководством академика НАН РК, А. А. Сатыбалдина. – Алматы: Институт экономики КН МОН РК, 2019. – 60 с.Satybaldina A. A. (Eds.). (2019). Konceptual'naya model' upravleniya i organizacii nauki Respubliki Kazahstan. Institut ekonomiki KN MON RK, Almaty, 60 p. (In Russian).Agrawal A. University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions // International Journal of Management Reviews. – 2001. – № 3. – P. 285-302.Agrawal, A. (2001). University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 285-302.Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D // Management Science. – 2002. – № 48(1). – P. 1-23.Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.Meyer-Krahmer F., Schmoch U. Sciencebased technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields // Research Policy. – 1998. – № 27. – P. 835-851.Meyer-Krahmer, F. and Schmoch, U. (1998). Sciencebased technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27, 835-851.Perkman M., Walsh K. University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda // International Journal of Management Reviews. – 2007. – № 9(4). – P. 259-280.Perkman, M. and Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280.Nambisan S., Sawhney M. A buyer’s guide to the innovation bazaar // Harvard Business Review. – 2007. – № 85(6). – P. 109-118.Nambisan, S. and Sawhney, M. (2007). A buyer’s guide to the innovation bazaar. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 109-118.Nishimura J., Okamuro H. Subsidy and Networking: The Effect of Direct and Indirect Support Programmes of Cluster Policy // Research Policy. – 2011. – № 40(5). – P. 714-727.Nishimura, J. and Okamuro, H. (2011). Subsidy and Networking: The Effect of Direct and Indirect Support Programmes of Cluster Policy. Research Policy, 40(5), 714-727.Dodgson M., Gann D., Slater A. The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Proctor & Gamble // R&D Management. – 2006. – № 36(3). – P. 333–346.Dodgson, M., Gann, D. and Slater, A. (2006). The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Proctor & Gamble. R&D Management, 36(3), 333–346.Trappey A. J. C., Trappey C. V., Hareesh Govindarajan U., Chuang A. C., Sun J. J. A Review of Essential Standards and Patent Landscapes for the Internet of Things: A Key Enabler for Industry 4.0. // Advanced Engineering Informatics. – 2016. – № 33. – P. 208-229. – DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2016.11.007.Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., Hareesh Govindarajan, U., Chuang, A. C. and Sun, J. J. (2016). A Review of Essential Standards and Patent Landscapes for the Internet of Things: A Key Enabler for Industry 4.0. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 33, 208-229, DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2016.11.007.Ilina I., Zharova E., Turginbayeva A., Agamirova E., Kamenskiy A. Network platform of commercializing the results of R&D // International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. – 2019. – № 10(01). – P. 2647-2657.Ilina, I., Zharova, E., Turginbayeva, A., Agamirova, E. and Kamenskiy, A. (2019). Network platform of commercializing the results of R&D. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(01), 2647-2657.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.