Eurasian economic integration: the challenges for small and medium companies
Аннотация
В данной статье исследуется интеграционные процессы на евразийском пространстве, уделяется особое внимание новому этапу интеграции – евразийскому экономическому союзу. Был рассчитан показатель открытости торговли между Казахстаном и странами-участницами до вступления и после вступления в союз. Авторами было проведено качественное исследование эффекта от экономической интеграции на предпринимательскую деятельность предприятий Казахстана в трех секторах. Результаты исследования представляют интерес правительству и институтам Евразийского экономического союза для улучшения политики дальнейшего развития интеграции.
Об авторах
А. К. Джумасейтова
Казахстанско-Британский технический университет
Казахстан
Казахстан
Джумасейтова Асель Кенесовна
Алматы
М. Бигабатова
Казахский Национальный университет им. Аль-Фараби
Казахстан
Казахстан
Бигабатова Мадина
Алматы
Список литературы
1. Haksöz, Ç., Seshadri, S., Iyer, A. V. (Eds.). Managing supply chains on the Silk Road: Strategy, performance, and risk. – London: Taylor & Francis, 2011.
2. Baldwin, R. E., Venables, A. J. Regional economic integration. Handbook of international economics. – 1995. – № 3. – pp. 1597-1644.
3. Baranovsky, V. The European Community in the system of international relations. The science. – 1986.
4. Parsons, T., Smelser, N. Economy and society: A study in the integration of economic and social theory. – London: Routledge, 2005.
5. Dicken, P. The Roepke lecture in economic geography global-local tensions: firms and states in the global space-economy // Economic Geography. – 1994. – № 70 (2). – pp. 101-128.
6. Perroux, F. A new concept of development: basic tenets. – London: Routledge, 2010.
7. Machlup, F. A History of Thought on Economic Integration (Presidential Address). In Economic integration: worldwide, regional, sectoral. – London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1976. – pp. 61-85.
8. Wille, P., Redden J. A comparative analysis of trade facilitation in selected regional and bilateral trade agreements and initiatives // Chapter II in ESCAP, Trade facilitation beyond the multilateral trade negotiations: Regional practices, customs valuation and other emerging issues – A study by the Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade. – NY: United Nations, 2007. – pp. 27-76.
9. Balassa, B. Towards a theory of economic integration // Kyklos. – 1961. – № 14 (1). – pp. 1-17.
10. Nguyen, H. T. N., Enderwick, P. The perceptions and responses of Vietnamese firms towards deeper regional economic integration: case studies from the food processing industry // Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE). –2016. – № 33 (1). – pp. 65-82.
11. Kyophilavong, P., Vanhnalat, B., Phonvisay, A. Lao SME participation in regional economic integration // Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE). – 2017. – № 34 (1). – pp. 193-220.
12. Thomas, A. O., Marandu, E. Rhetoric and realities of regional integration: Botswana SME perspectives on Southern African trade // South African Journal of Business Management. – 2017. – № 48 (2). – pp. 75-86.
13. Gatto, F. Mercosur: its challenges to small and medium-sized industrial enterprises in terms of competition // Cepal Review. – 1999.
14. Huin, S. F., Luong, L. H. S., Abhary, K. Knowledge-based tool for planning of enterprise resources in ASEAN SMEs // Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. – 2003. – № 19 (5). – pp. 409-414.
15. Dilger, R. J. The European Union's small business act: a different approach // Current Politics & Economics of Europe. – 2016. – № 27 (2).
16. Kausikan, B., Devan, J., Chan, H. C., Ong, K. Y., Pillai, G. Dealing with an ambiguous world. – World Scientific Publishing Company Pte. Limited, 2017.
17. Soesastro, H., Basri, M. C. The political economy of trade policy in Indonesia // ASEAN Economic Bulletin. – 2005. – pp. 3-18.
18. Bąkiewicz, A. Transformation of economic system in Poland. The SMEs and EU integration // Revista Universitaria Ruta. – 2012. – № 13. – pp. 71-86.
19. Tran, H. T. T. Challenges of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) In Vietnam during the Process of Integration into the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) // International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting. – 2015. – № 5 (2). – pp. 133-143.
20. Tang, S. Economic integration in Central Asia: the Russian and Chinese relationship // Asian Survey. – 2000. – № 40 (2). – pp. 360-376.
21. Dragneva, R., Wolczuk, K. Russia, the Eurasian Customs Union and the EU: Cooperation, Stagnation or Rivalry? – 2012.
22. Leskova, I. V., Ermakov, D. N., Andruschenko, G. I., Raspopov, S. V., Khmelevskaya, S. A. Relevant aspects of the integration of post-soviet countries in the project of the Eurasian economic space // Review of European Studies. – 2015. – № 7 (6). – pp. 231-238.
23. Tarr, D. G. The Eurasian Economic Union of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and the Kyrgyz Republic: Can It Succeed Where Its Predecessor Failed? // Eastern European Economics. – 2016. – № 54 (1). – pp. 1-22.
24. Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research // The qualitative researcher’s companion. – 2002. – № 573. – pp. 305-329.
25. Fisher, A. G. Production, primary, secondary and tertiary // Economic record. – 1939. – № 15 (1). – pp. 24-38.
26. Economic Commission for Europe United Nations. Small and medium-sized enterprises in countries in transition. – UN. – 2003.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Джумасейтова А.К., Бигабатова М. Eurasian economic integration: the challenges for small and medium companies. Central Asian Economic Review. 2018;(1):110-121.
For citation:
Jumasseitova A., Bigabatova M. Eurasian economic integration: the challenges for small and medium companies. Central Asian Economic Review. 2018;(1):110-121.
Просмотров:
335
Послать статью по эл. почте 