Eurasian economic integration: the challenges for small and medium companies
Аннотация
В данной статье исследуется интеграционные процессы на евразийском пространстве, уделяется особое внимание новому этапу интеграции – евразийскому экономическому союзу. Был рассчитан показатель открытости торговли между Казахстаном и странами-участницами до вступления и после вступления в союз. Авторами было проведено качественное исследование эффекта от экономической интеграции на предпринимательскую деятельность предприятий Казахстана в трех секторах. Результаты исследования представляют интерес правительству и институтам Евразийского экономического союза для улучшения политики дальнейшего развития интеграции.
Об авторах
А. К. ДжумасейтоваКазахстан
Джумасейтова Асель Кенесовна
Алматы
М. Бигабатова
Казахстан
Бигабатова Мадина
Алматы
Список литературы
1. Haksöz, Ç., Seshadri, S., Iyer, A. V. (Eds.). Managing supply chains on the Silk Road: Strategy, performance, and risk. – London: Taylor & Francis, 2011.
2. Baldwin, R. E., Venables, A. J. Regional economic integration. Handbook of international economics. – 1995. – № 3. – pp. 1597-1644.
3. Baranovsky, V. The European Community in the system of international relations. The science. – 1986.
4. Parsons, T., Smelser, N. Economy and society: A study in the integration of economic and social theory. – London: Routledge, 2005.
5. Dicken, P. The Roepke lecture in economic geography global-local tensions: firms and states in the global space-economy // Economic Geography. – 1994. – № 70 (2). – pp. 101-128.
6. Perroux, F. A new concept of development: basic tenets. – London: Routledge, 2010.
7. Machlup, F. A History of Thought on Economic Integration (Presidential Address). In Economic integration: worldwide, regional, sectoral. – London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1976. – pp. 61-85.
8. Wille, P., Redden J. A comparative analysis of trade facilitation in selected regional and bilateral trade agreements and initiatives // Chapter II in ESCAP, Trade facilitation beyond the multilateral trade negotiations: Regional practices, customs valuation and other emerging issues – A study by the Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade. – NY: United Nations, 2007. – pp. 27-76.
9. Balassa, B. Towards a theory of economic integration // Kyklos. – 1961. – № 14 (1). – pp. 1-17.
10. Nguyen, H. T. N., Enderwick, P. The perceptions and responses of Vietnamese firms towards deeper regional economic integration: case studies from the food processing industry // Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE). –2016. – № 33 (1). – pp. 65-82.
11. Kyophilavong, P., Vanhnalat, B., Phonvisay, A. Lao SME participation in regional economic integration // Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE). – 2017. – № 34 (1). – pp. 193-220.
12. Thomas, A. O., Marandu, E. Rhetoric and realities of regional integration: Botswana SME perspectives on Southern African trade // South African Journal of Business Management. – 2017. – № 48 (2). – pp. 75-86.
13. Gatto, F. Mercosur: its challenges to small and medium-sized industrial enterprises in terms of competition // Cepal Review. – 1999.
14. Huin, S. F., Luong, L. H. S., Abhary, K. Knowledge-based tool for planning of enterprise resources in ASEAN SMEs // Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. – 2003. – № 19 (5). – pp. 409-414.
15. Dilger, R. J. The European Union's small business act: a different approach // Current Politics & Economics of Europe. – 2016. – № 27 (2).
16. Kausikan, B., Devan, J., Chan, H. C., Ong, K. Y., Pillai, G. Dealing with an ambiguous world. – World Scientific Publishing Company Pte. Limited, 2017.
17. Soesastro, H., Basri, M. C. The political economy of trade policy in Indonesia // ASEAN Economic Bulletin. – 2005. – pp. 3-18.
18. Bąkiewicz, A. Transformation of economic system in Poland. The SMEs and EU integration // Revista Universitaria Ruta. – 2012. – № 13. – pp. 71-86.
19. Tran, H. T. T. Challenges of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) In Vietnam during the Process of Integration into the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) // International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting. – 2015. – № 5 (2). – pp. 133-143.
20. Tang, S. Economic integration in Central Asia: the Russian and Chinese relationship // Asian Survey. – 2000. – № 40 (2). – pp. 360-376.
21. Dragneva, R., Wolczuk, K. Russia, the Eurasian Customs Union and the EU: Cooperation, Stagnation or Rivalry? – 2012.
22. Leskova, I. V., Ermakov, D. N., Andruschenko, G. I., Raspopov, S. V., Khmelevskaya, S. A. Relevant aspects of the integration of post-soviet countries in the project of the Eurasian economic space // Review of European Studies. – 2015. – № 7 (6). – pp. 231-238.
23. Tarr, D. G. The Eurasian Economic Union of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and the Kyrgyz Republic: Can It Succeed Where Its Predecessor Failed? // Eastern European Economics. – 2016. – № 54 (1). – pp. 1-22.
24. Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research // The qualitative researcher’s companion. – 2002. – № 573. – pp. 305-329.
25. Fisher, A. G. Production, primary, secondary and tertiary // Economic record. – 1939. – № 15 (1). – pp. 24-38.
26. Economic Commission for Europe United Nations. Small and medium-sized enterprises in countries in transition. – UN. – 2003.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Джумасейтова А.К., Бигабатова М. Eurasian economic integration: the challenges for small and medium companies. Central Asian Economic Review. 2018;(1):110-121.
For citation:
Jumasseitova A., Bigabatova M. Eurasian economic integration: the challenges for small and medium companies. Central Asian Economic Review. 2018;(1):110-121.