TENDENCIES AND FEATURES OF INNOVATIVE POLICY OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE U.S., JAPAN AND EUROPEAN UNION)
Abstract
The research shows the tendencies in strengthening state regulation of innovative activity, which are visible in developing innovative systems of several countries (the U.S., Japan and European Union). The paper reviews the features of innovative policy in the U.S., contributing to its activation. The author reveals also the features of innovative policy in Japan, covering the efforts of the state and business in achieving the best results of innovative activity.
It is reported the features of main public regulation measures of innovative activity in the EU member-states, which successfully develop national and regional innovative systems too (Germany, United Kingdom and France). The research presents several recommendations regarding the possible consideration of tendencies in improving regulation measures of innovative activity, created as a result of the research.
Purpose – to assess the features and tendencies of strengthening of innovative policy of foreign countries (on the example of the U.S., Japan and the European Union) for possible its consideration in improving regulation measures of innovative activity in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Methodology – synthesis, content-analyze, accommodation, monographic method, factor analysis, economic-statistical research method.
Originality/value – in countries that have achieved significant results in the innovative development, along with the direct methods of state regulation, the most important place that takes financing, and also are taken the measures for the diffusion of innovations with an emphasis on stimulating methods. One of the problems to be solved in close combination of these methods is the development of innovative cooperation.
Findings – globalization and regionalization, the growth of high-end technologies, the limited resources of domestic subjects of innovative activity lead to the fact that innovative cooperation has the significant potential for activization of innovative activity, including at the regional level, and the degree of intensity of its use within state regulation of innovative activity is increasing rapidly. This is evidenced by the experience of the EU, U.S. and Japan.
About the Author
Dana Bekniyazova
Innovative University of Eurasia
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
PhD, Associated Professor
Pavlodar
References
1. Kondratiev, V. B. (2018), “Glabal’nye cepochki dobavlennoi stoimosti v sovremennoi ekonomike”: setevoe izdanie Centra issledovaniy i analitiki Fonda istoricheskoi perspektivy “Perspectivy”, available at: http://www.perspektivy.info/oykumena/ekdom/globalnyje_cepochki_dobavlennoj_stoimosti_v_sovremennoj_ekonomike_2014-03-17.htm (Accessed September, 09, 2018) (In Russian)
2. Zadumkin, K.А., Terebova, S. V. Mezhdunarodnoe nauchno-tekhnicheskoe sotrudnichestvo: sushchost’, soderzhanie i formy // Problemy razvitiya territorii. - 2009. - № 1. - S. 22-30 (In Russian)
3. Naklonov, D. N. Inovacionnoe razvitie gosudarstva v usloviyakh globalizacii // Креативная экономика. - 2008. - № 6. - С. 40-46 (In Russian)
4. Klochkova, N. V., Berdichevskaya, V. О. Razvitie innovacionnoi deyatel’nosti: obobshchenie zarubezhnogo opyta // Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo energeticheskogo universiteta. - 2012. - № 1. - S. 78-82 (In Russian)
5. Mantayeva, E. I., Slobodchikova, I. V., Cedenov, A. V. Komparativnyi analiz osnovnkh meropriyatiy nacional’noi i regional’noi podderzhki innovacionnoi deyatel’nosti v Rossii I zarubezhnykh stranah // Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal. - 2011. - № 36. - S. 27 (In Russian)
6. EUREKA. Doing Business through Technology (2011), 25 Year Country Overviews. 1985 - 2011. - Brussels: EUREKA, available at: http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/EUREKA/bilgi_gunleri/1-EUREKAEurostarsProgramme.pdf (Accessed August, 21, 2018)
7. MSTI databases (2017), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2016. Main Science and Technology indicators, available at: http://stats.oecd.org/ (Accessed September, 24, 2018)
8. Eurostat 2015: Innovation Statistics. Statistics Explained (2016), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Innovation_statistics (Accessed September, 18, 2018)
9. Rykhtik, М. I., Korsunskaya, Е. V. Nacional’naya innovacionnaya sistema SSCHA: istoriya formirovaniya, politicheskaya praktika, strategiya razvitiya // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. - 2012. - № 6-1. - S. 263-268 (In Russian)
10. Edgington, D. W. (2008) The Japanese Innovation System: University-Industry Linkages, Small Firms and Regional Technology Clusters // Prometheus. - Vol. 26. - №1. – P. 19.
11. Europe 2020: Europe’s growth strategy (2013), Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013. – 12 p., available at: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/europe_2020_explained.pdf (Accessed August, 24, 2018)
12. Zuckerman, V. А. Ispol’zovanie mirovogo opyta realizacii programm innovacionnogo razvitiya dlya ekonomiki Severa // Sever i rynok. - 2008. - № 1. - S. 84-88 (In Russian)
13. Artis, M., Nixcon, F. (2007), “The Economics of the European Union: Policy and Analysis”. - 4th ed. England: Oxford University Press, 565 p.
14. Kalyagin, V. О., Naumov, V. B., Nikiforova, T. S. Opyt Evropy, SSCHA i Indii v sphere gosudarstbennoi podderzhki innovaciy // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2011. - № 1. - S. 171-183 (In Russian)
15. Korolev. V. I. Innovacionnye territorial’nye klastery: zarubezhnyi opyt i rossiyskie usloviya // Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskiy vestnik. - 2013. - № 11. - S. 20-27 (In Russian)
16. Filatov, V. V. Foreign experience of state regulation of innovative activity // Innovative Management: Theory, methodology, practice. – 2012. - № 1. – P. 206-213 (In Russian)
17. Navrotskaya, N. А., Sopilko, N. Yu. Transformaciya investicionno-proizvodstvennogo prostranstva kak uslovie ekonomicheskoi integracii // Voprosy regional’noi ekonomiki. - 2013. - № 2. - S. 63-69 (In Russian)
18. Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology – MERIT 2016 (2017), European Innovation Scoreboard 2016. Maastricht University, available at: http://www.knowledgetransferireland.com/About_KTI/Reports-Publications/European-Innovation-Scoreboard-2016.pdf (Accessed August, 14, 2018)
Review
For citations:
Bekniyazova D. TENDENCIES AND FEATURES OF INNOVATIVE POLICY OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE U.S., JAPAN AND EUROPEAN UNION). Central Asian Economic Review. 2018;(5-6):191-199.
Views:
264
Email this article 