Analysis of carbon storage and economic value of different land use types in Kazakhstan (2001–2020)

Research purpose. The research analyzes the causes and impacts of land degradation in Kazakhstan, focusing on its economic and environmental consequences. The study explores potential solutions for mitigating land degradation and promoting sustainable land use practices.

Methodology. The study utilizes a combination of comparative, systemic, and dialectical approaches. The comparative method examines land degradation trends across different regions. At the same time, the systemic approach provides a holistic view of the interdependencies between land use practices, climate change, and socio-economic factors. The dialectical method helps to understand the dynamic interactions and long-term consequences of land degradation.

Originality/Value of the Research. This research contributes to understanding land degradation in Kazakhstan by incorporating innovative approaches such as ecological branding as a driver of sustainable land management. The study also highlights the importance of transitioning to a green economy as a key strategy for mitigating land degradation and achieving sustainable development goals.

Findings. The study outlines the key stages of land degradation in Kazakhstan, identifying the main contributing factors and regions most affected. The findings emphasize the need for integrated land management practices and the adoption of sustainable solutions to combat land degradation. Recommendations are provided for policy interventions to restore degraded lands and promote sustainable agricultural practices.

1. Nachtergaele, F., et al. (2010). The harmonized world soil database. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science, 34–37.

2. Nkonya, E., et al. (2016). Concepts and methods of global assessment of the economics of land degradation and improvement. In E. Nkonya et al. (Eds.), Economics of land degradation and improvement—A global assessment for sustainable development (pp. 15–32). Springer.

3. Trucost Plc. (2008). The economic value of ecosystem services in the Nordic countries. Nordic Council of Ministers.

4. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., et al. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158.

5. Lal, R. (2001). Soil degradation by erosion. Land Degradation & Development, 12(6), 519–539.

6. Sutton, P. C., Anderson, S. J., Costanza, R., & Kubiszewski, I. (2016). The ecological economics of land degradation: Impacts on ecosystem service values. Ecological Economics, 129, 182–192.

7. Montanarella, L., Pennock, D. J., McKenzie, N., et al. (2016). World’s soils are under threat. SOIL, 2(1), 79–82.

8. Hernández, R. C., & Camerin, F. (2024). The application of ecosystem assessments in land use planning: A case study for supporting decisions toward ecosystem protection. Futures, 103, 399.

9. Mueller, L., Schindler, U., Fodor, N., et al. (2010). Impacts of land use change on soil health and ecosystem services in dynamic landscapes: Toward sustainable land management in Europe. Environmental Earth Sciences, 69(2), 241–255.

10. Barbier, E. B. (2011). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Cambridge University Press.

11. Moussadek, R., Mrabet, R., Dahan, R., Zouahri, A., El Mourid, M., & Ranst, E. V. (2014). Tillage system affects soil organic carbon storage and quality in Central Morocco. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2014.

12. Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., et al. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734), 570–574.

13. Nkonya, E., Gerber, N., von Braun, J., & De Pinto, A. (2011). Economics of land degradation. IFPRI Issue Brief No. 68.

14. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2011). The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture (SOLAW) - Managing systems at risk. Rome: FAO.

15. LP DAAC. (n.d.). Land cover search. Retrieved February 14, 2025, from https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/search/