APPLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF PROJECT SYSTEM IN PUBLIC GOVERNANCE

In many developed foreign countries, the project approach in the field of public administration has proven to be quite effective. In this regard, it is advisable to consider international experience in the application of the project approach, problems that arise, errors.
The purpose – of this article is to review the accumulated experience in various countries, to identify the shortcomings of project management in order to avoid them or reduce them when they are introduced into the government of Kazakhstan.
Methodology – The scientific and practical significance of the work lies in the fact that a comparative analysis of project management models has been carried out and a proprietary model has been proposed that is acceptable for Kazakhstan with regard to its features. This will reduce the material and time costs of developing and implementing project management in the structure of public administration in Kazakhstan. Mainly used synthesis, comparative analysis.
The following conclusions – were made: the indisputable value of project management for Kazakhstan was established, in which project management is widely used in various fields of activity, especially in business structures. However, there is a lag in public administration, which needs to be overcome with the help of the proposed adapted original model of the project approach in the field of public administration. The modern needs of public administration in Kazakhstan are justified in the use of adapted positive foreign experience in the formation of a national model of project management in public administration in Kazakhstan. There are drawbacks to the concept and methodology of project management. International and national standards developed abroad in the area of the project approach are given.
The value – of the research performed is that this work makes a definite contribution to project management in the government of Kazakhstan. The reasons for the difficulties in introducing this management technology in the form of insufficient and fragmentary training of specialists in the field of public administration, the lack of differentiation between process and project activities, the peculiarities of the bureaucratic apparatus in various countries have been established.

1. Issatayeva K. B., Adambekova А.А. The Republic of Kazakhstan Budget System Development and the Increase of its Transparency // American Journal of Applied Sciences 2016, 13 (4): рр.364-371.

2. Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. On approval of the strategic development plan until 2025 and recognition of some decrees of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan invalid: approved. February 15, 2018, No 636.

3. Gomes J., Romão M. Improving Project Success: A Case Study Using Benefits and Project Management // Procedures Computer Science, Volume 100, 2016, рр. 489-497.

4. Dwivedi O.P. and William G., Public Administration and IASIA: Promoting Admin-istrative Excellence Globally, in Dwivedi, O.P. (ed.), Public Administration in a Global Context: IASIA at 50, Brussels: Bruylant, 2011, pp. 21-52.

5. Petrov M.N. Evolution and directions of development of the project management paradigm // Economy: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2017. Volume 7. No 2A. рp. 210-221.

6. Mudacumura GM, Mebratu D., Haque M.S., eds. (2006). CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742; pр.15- 17.

7. Gagarsky V. A. Process and project management // Portal "Project Management Professional". [Electronic resource] URL: http://www.pmprofy.ru/content/rus/219/2197-article.asp. (Appeal date: 03/03/2019).

8. Nikolaev, A.A., Dunaeva, A.I., Udachin, N.O. Improvement of Project Management Processes in the Russian Federation // Internet-magazine “SCIENCE”. 2014. № 3. [Electronic resource] URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovershenstvovanie-protsessov-proektnogo-upravleniya-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii. (Appeal date: 03/03/2019).

9. Khan Z. & Morshed M. Implementing the formal project management to local government projects // Implementing the formal project management to local government projects. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012 — North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.

10. Trofimova O. M., Makovkina S. A. Introduction of project management standards in state and municipal management // Issues of management. 2016.- № С.52-58.

11. Tumasova N.V. Features of the formation of a national model of project management in the Republic of Kazakhstan // Economics. - 2016. № 10 (19). https://economic-theory.com/blizhajshij-nomer/ekonomika-iupravlenie-narodnym-khozyajstvom/216-osobennosti-formirovaniya-natsionalnoj-modeli.html (Appeal date: 03/03/2019).

12. Vasilyev A.I., Prokofiev S.E. Organization of project management in government bodies // Management sciences. 2016. № 4. рр. 44-53.

13. Crawford, J Kent; Pennypacker, James S. Put an End to Project Management. Optimize. Oct. 2002. pр. 73-78.

14. Natalia F. Altukhova Elena V. Vasileva, Boris B. Slavin, // Business Informatics. 2016. №4 (38). pр.60-69.

15. Eurasian way of project management. Research report [Electronic resource]. M .: Eurasian Center for Project Management, 2008. 248 p. Access mode: http://www.epmc.ru/docs/report_080725.html/ (Appeal date: 03/03/2019).

16. Isabaeva S. The Central Asian region has been behind project management for more than 30 years: Interview with President of the Union of Project Managers of the Republic of Kazakhstan A. Tsekhov. [Electronic resource]. Union of Project Managers of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2016. Access Mode: http://spmrk.kz/biblioteka/nashi-publikatsii/216-tsentralno-aziatskij-region-otstal-v-proektnom-menedzhmentebolee-chem-na-30-let.html /(Appeal Date: 03/03/2019).

17. Kerzner, Harold. 2004. Advanced Project Management: Best Practices of Implementation. USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

18. Wollmann H. Evaluation in Public Sector Reform, Concepts and Practice in International Perspective. Cheltenham / Northhampton: Edward Elgar, 2003.

19. Garyudova A.V., Kryukova O.A., Leonova O.V. Project Management in the System of Government: Problems of Application // Srednerussky Bulletin of Social Sciences. - 2016. T.11. №4. рр.203-213.

20. Robinson M. From the Old Public Administration. Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. 2015. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/capacity-development/English/Singapore%20Centre/PS-Reform_Paper.pdf (Appeal date: 03/03/2019).

21. Collins P. The Vicissitudes of Change: Public Policy Sidelines. Public Administration - the 1980s, in Dwivedi, O.P. (ed.), Public Administration in a Global Context: IASIA at 50, Brussels: Bruylant, 2011, pp. 75-97.

22. Young R., Young M., Jordan E. and O’Connor, P., Strategy Is the Strategy Being Implemented through Projects? Contrary Evidence from a Leader in New Public Management, 2012, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 887-900.

23. Rondinelli, D. A. (1976). Why development projects fail: problems of project management in developing countries. Project Management Quarterly, 7(1), рр.10–15.

24. Powell, M.D. and De Vries, M.S., The Pragmatic Institutionalism: NPM, in Dwivedi, O.P. (ed.), Public Administration in a Global Context: IASIA at 50, Brussels: Bruylant, 2011, pp. 99-128.

25. Nicolaides P., Preparing for EU Membership: The Paradox of the EU, 2003, Eipascope, vol. 2, pp. 11-17.

26. Youker R. Managing the Cycle for Time, Cost and Quality: Lessons from the World Bank Experience. International Journal of Project Management, 1989, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 52-57.

27. Rondinelli D. A. Project Identification in Economic Development, Journal of World Trade Law, 1976, vol. 10. рр.27-36.

28. Eduardo С., Serra M., Kunc М. International Journal of Project Management. Volume 33, Issue 1, January 2015, pp. 53-66.

29. Isabaeva S. “The Central Asian region has been behind project management for more than 30 years”: Interview with President of the Union of Project Managers of the Republic of Kazakhstan A. Tsekhov. [Electronic resource]. Union of project managers of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019. Access mode: http://spmrk.kz/biblioteka/nashi-publikatsii/216-tsentralno-aziatskij-region-otstal-v-proektnom-menedzhmentebolee-chem-na-30-let.html / (appeal date: 03/02/2019)

30. The Protecting Business and Investments project office was opened Access mode: http://www.kyzmet.gov.kz/ru/news/sostoyalos-otkrytie-proektnogo-ofisa-protecting-business-and-investments?roistat_visit=1046381 (appeal date: 03/02/2019)

31. Zatolokin V. I., Tulekbayev E. T. Formation and development of national innovative potential in the field of professional project management in Kazakhstan. [Electronic resource]: The site of the Institute of Project Management PMI RK Access Mode: www.pmikz.org/content/pdf/110107form.pdf (appeal date: 03/02/2019)

32. M. Isabekova. Introduction of project management in the public sector: resistance is inevitable? [Electronic resource]. https://www.zakon.kz/4868695-vnedrenie-proektnogo-upravleniya-v.html (appeal date: 03/02/2019)

33. Ikeanyibe O. New Public Management and Administrative Reforms in Nigeria // International Journal of Public Administration · November 2015.

34. Yumin Qiu, Hongquan Chen, Zhaohan Sheng, Shuping Cheng Governance of Institutional Integration in megaproject organizations // International Journal of Project Management. - Volume 37, Issue 3, April 2019, рp. 425-443.