Preview

Methodological Foundations of the Organization of Accounting for Environmental Costs

https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2025-1-169-187

Abstract

Purpose of the study. At the time of changing and actual development of the economy, the effective activity of business entities is primarily determined by its competitive ability. A competitive entity is an organization with high value and demand for its products. The price of the manufactured product and the performed work is determined by the level of costs spent on its preparation and production.

In this scientific article, the necessity of environmental accounting in modern conditions, aimed at achieving the final strategy of production to reduce the impact of harm caused to our environment by business entities that produce products, is determined. In order to evaluate environmental factors, there is a need to create a systematic accounting system that continues the formation of expenses for environmental protection and their connections with economic expenses.

The purpose of the article is to disclose the methodology of "environmental cost accounting", which reflects the relationship between economic costs and environmental protection costs, which allows ensuring the competitiveness and reliability of products.

Research methodology. During the writing of the article, economic analysis, management accounting methods, monographic studies and graphic methods were used.

Originality / value of the study. The conclusions and methodical recommendations obtained as a result of the research of the scientific article will help to form their own value through the rational management of production-economic and environmental costs of production-oriented business entities. At the same time, it contributes to the optimal organization of environmental measures and services of economic entities.

Results of the study. In the main content of the article, the concept of determining the target intrinsic value is given, the place and methodology of environmental cost calculation is studied in order to determine the competitiveness of the product and the impact of production damage on the environment.

About the Authors

N. S. Nurkasheva
Almaty Management University
Kazakhstan

Almaty.



B. A. Abdullaeva
Narxoz University
Kazakhstan

Almaty.



A. E. Imataeva
Narxoz University
Kazakhstan

Almaty.



References

1. Ismail, M. H., Cassim, A. N. M., & Athambawa, H. (2021). A systematic review on environmentalaccounting. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27(4), 11–13. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/asystematic-review-on-environmental-accounting-10913

2. Korabaev, B. S., & Abdrahmanova, N. B. (2020). Jekologijalyк eseptіlіk: kарzhylyк eseptіlіktegі manyzymen adіstemesі [Environmental accounting: The importance and system in financial accounting]. Manash Kozybaev atyndaғy Soltүstіk-Kazaқstan memlekettіk universitetіnіn habarshysy, 1, 108–115.

3. Samambaeva, A., & Kovalenko, V. (2023). Novye standarty MSFO: kak podruzhit' klimat i den'gi [New IFRS standards: How to reconcile climate and money]. Forbes Kazakhstan. https://forbes.kz/actual/expertise (Accessed: 16.09.2024)

4. «ҚR-nyң jekologijalyқ Kodeksі» [Environmental Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. (2021). Adilet [web-portal]. https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K2100000400 (Accessed: 16.09.2024)

5. «KR-nyң Salyk Kodeksі» [Tax Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. (2024). Adilet [web-portal]. https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1700000120 (Accessed: 16.09.2024)

6. Mongush, A. D. (2014). Jekologicheskij uchet na mikrourovne [Environmental accounting at the microlevel]. Science Time, 7, 272–278.

7. Rio-de-Zhanejrskaja deklaracija OON po okruzhajushhej srede i razvitiju [Rio Declaration on Environment and Development]. (1992). United Nations [web-portal]. https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/riodecl.shtml (Accessed: 17.09.2024)

8. Begeeva, G. Zh., & Imanbaeva, Z. O. (2018). Jekologicheskij uchet v Kazahstane: problemy stanovlenijai razvitija [Environmental accounting in Kazakhstan: Problems of formation and development]. Science Forum. https://scienceforum.ru/2018/article/2018002334 (Accessed: 17.09.2024)

9. Saenko, K. S. (2005). Uchet ekologicheskikh zatrat [Accounting of environmental costs]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika.

10. Il'icheva, E. V. (2009). Model' jekologicheskogo buhgalterskogo ucheta v sootvetstvii s polozhenijamiKiotskogo Protokola [Model of environmental accounting in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol]. Zhurnal Fundamental'nye issledovanija, 1, 67–68.

11. Kyoto Protocol 10th Anniversary. (2015, February 13). UNFCCC Secretariat. https://unfccc.int/news/kyoto-protocol-10th-anniversary-timely-reminder-climate-agreements-work (Accessed: 21.09.2024)

12. Rezul'taty Indeksa jekologicheskoj jeffektivnosti 2024 goda [Results of the Environmental Performance Index 2024]. (2024). Economy.kz. https://economy.kz/?p=5273#:~:text (Accessed: 22.09.2024)

13. QR Statistika Agenttіgіnің resmi akparattary [Official statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. (2024). Stat.gov.kz. https://old.stat.gov.kz (Accessed: 24.09.2024)

14. Shapiguzov, S. M. (1997). Sistema ucheta prirodoohrannoj dejatel'nosti predprijatija [System of environmental protection accounting at the enterprise]. Moscow: FBK-PRESS.

15. Kozhukhova, O. S. (2012). Buhgalterskij uchet i otchetnosti v sisteme jekologicheskogo kontrollinga neftegazovyh kompaniy: monografija [Accounting and reporting in the system of environmental controlling of oil and gas companies: Monograph]. Novosibirsk: NGTU.

16. – Baǵalau mindettemeleri, shartty mindettemeler zhәne shartty aktivter [37 – Valuation obligations, contingent liabilities, and contingent assets]. (2015). NKES. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30792076

17. Tuyaqova, Z. S., & Çertkova, A. A. (2009). Qazirgi bwxgalterlik eseptegi ékologïyalıq şığındardıñjiktelwi [Detailed environmental costs in current accounting]. OMW xabarşısı, 8(102), 111–116.

18. Yerdavletova, F. K., Zhumabayeva, M. D., & Nurkasheva, N. S. (2020). State and problems ofdevelopment of environmental accounting: Experience of Kazakhstan. Economy: Strategy and Practice, 15(2), 139–150.

19. Beysenbaeva, A. Q., & Dosaeva, A. J. (2017). Şığındardıñ esebin jetildirwdiñ ékologïyası [Ecology ofimproving cost accounting]. Qazw Xabarşısı. Ékonomïka serïyası, 2(120), 99–102.

20. Popova, E. L., & Morozova, E. V. (2012). Qorşağan ortanı qorğaw şığındarınıñ esebi [Accounting for environmental protection costs]. Syktyvkar: Syktyvkar Forestry Institute.

21. Jing, H., & Songing, L. (2011). The research of environmental costs based on activity-based cost. 2011 3rd International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology, ESIAT 2011. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10, 147–151.

22. Al Sufi, F. H., Al Qatish, H. M., & Garageesh, J. (2012). The importance of cost and environmentaldisclosure in the rationalization of administrative decisions in the industrial joint stock companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange. The Faculty of Managerial and Financial Sciences, The University of Isra, 1–31.

23. Zeng, L. X., He, P., & Shi, J. P. (2019). Problems and countermeasures in environmental cost accounting: A case study of China's coal industry. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20198301013 (Accessed: 07.02.2025)

24. ISAR (International Standards of Accounting and Reporting). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/c2isard2_ru.pdf (Accessed: 07.02.2025)


Review

For citations:


Nurkasheva N.S., Abdullaeva B.A., Imataeva A.E. Methodological Foundations of the Organization of Accounting for Environmental Costs. Central Asian Economic Review. 2025;(1):169-187. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2025-1-169-187

Views: 19


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2789-4398 (Print)
ISSN 2789-4401 (Online)