International Experience in Establishing National Innovation Systems: Experience for Kazakhstan

The purpose of this research is to analyze international approaches to the development of national innovation systems (NIS), with a particular focus on countries in Western Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, and the United States. The study aims to identify the most effective models and assess their applicability to Kazakhstan's national context.

The methodology of the research is based on comparative analysis, allowing for a detailed examination of various NIS models and the conditions under which they have been successfully implemented. Particular attention is given to the institutional roles of government, scientific and industrial infrastructure, and human capital in driving innovation.

The scientific novelty (originality / value) of the work lies in its comprehensive evaluation of global innovation policy frameworks and their potential adaptation to Kazakhstan’s national context. The research provides valuable insights for policymakers by bridging international experience with local development needs.

The research findings reveal that successful innovation systems rely on strong collaboration between key stakeholders—government, business, academia, and civil society. In Kazakhstan, the current low level of innovation activity and weak performance in global innovation rankings underscore the urgency of reform. The study identifies tailored strategies to foster a more effective and context-sensitive national innovation system capable of supporting long-term, sustainable economic growth.

1. United Nations. (2024). Sustainable Development Goals Data Dashboard. Retrieved from September 15,2024. URL: https://w3.unece.org/SDG/ru/Indicator?id=125

2. Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic ofKazakhstan. (2024). Goal 9. Industrialization, innovation and infrastructure. Retrieved from August 28, 2024. URL: https://stat.gov.kz/ru/sustainable-development-goals/goal/9/

3. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactivelearning. London: Pinter Publishers.

4. Nelson, R. R. (2009). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. Retrieved from August 16, 2024. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496195

5. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystemsmean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

6. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

7. Marcinkevich, V. I. (2006). Problema effektivnosti v XXI veke: ekonomika SShA [The problem ofefficiency in the 21st century: US economy] (in Russian). Moskva: Nauka.

8. Baert, P., & Rubio, F. (2011). The politics of knowledge. London: Routledge.

9. Zamulin, O. A., & Sonin, K. I. (2019). Ekonomicheskii rost: Nobelevskaia premiia 2018 goda i urokidlia Rossii [Economic growth: The 2018 Nobel Prize and lessons for Russia]. Voprosy ekonomiki, (1), 11–36. (in Russian)

10. France Biotech. (n.d.). Status of the Young Innovative Company. Retrieved from August 16, 2024. URL: https://www.yicstatus.com/Documents/stockholm/Fact_sheet_on_YIC_status_in_France.pdf

11. Ministerstvo ekonomicheskogo razvitiia RF. (n.d.). Spravka o mezhdunarodnom opyte innovatsionnogo razvitiia [Summary on international innovation development experience] (in Russian). Retrieved from July 6, 2024. URL: http://www.ved.gov.ru/moder_innovac/analitic/

12. European Commission. (2024). Official website. Retrieved from August 8, 2024. URL: https://www.ec.europa.eu

13. Davýdenko, E. V. (2014). Modeli natsional'nykh innovatsionnykh sistem: zarubezhnyi opyt i adaptatsiiadlia Rossii [Models of national innovation systems: foreign experience and adaptation for Russia]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki, (4), 23–26. (in Russian)

14. World Economic Forum. (2020). The Global Competitiveness Report 2020. Retrieved from August 21,2024. URL: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-global-competitiveness-report-2020/

15. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). Mode 3 and quadruple helix: Toward a 21st centuryfractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 47(3/4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374

16. The World Bank. (2024). High-technology exports 2007–2022. Retrieved from August 1, 2024. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.TECH.CD?end=2021&most_recent_value_desc=true&start=2007&view=chart