International practice of the bonus-malus system
https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2024-2-147-159
Abstract
Purpose of the research – evaluation of the eff ectiveness of the "bonus-malus" in the class of compulsory insurance of civil liability of vehicle owners and the identification of the conceptual foundations of compulsory insurance of civil liability inherent in the experience of foreign countries, as well as the development of proposals to improve the rules of this insurance.
Methodology – the methodological basis of the research was the works and publications of foreign economic scientists, a set of general scientifi c and private methods of scientific cognition (analytical, systematic method, analysis, synthesis, comparison, etc.).
Originality / value – in order to ensure a balance with favorable values of compulsory civil liability insurance, methodological approaches to the modernization of the bonus-malus system are provided and determined by the expediency and possibility of use in the insurance market of kazakhstan.
Findings – it provides for the use of optimal ways of differentiating insurance tariff s by domestic insurance companies, taking into account the degree of risk and interests of policyholders of various categories, and maintaining the availability of tariffs for a wide range of consumers of insurance services.
About the Authors
A. O. BazarbayevKazakhstan
Almaty
B. K. Kupeshova
Kazakhstan
Almaty
B. J. Akpanbetova
Russian Federation
Almaty
References
1. Lemer, J. (1998). Avtomobilnoe strahovanie. Aktuarnye problemy. M.: «Janus-k». 316 P. (In russian).
2. Lemer, J. (1998). Sistemy bonus-malus v avtomobilnom strahovanii. M.: «Janus-k». 268 P. (In russian).
3. Falin, G. İ. (1994). Matematicheski analiz riskov v strahovanii [Математический анализ рисков в страховании]. Ros. İurid. İzdatelski dom. 85 s.
4. Hulin, L., Justens, D., & Pictet-luxembourg, B. (2002). General properties of mixed poisson distributions: application to data fitting in the case of "automobile collision claims" distributions. In 2<sup>nd</sup> conference in actuarial science & finance in samos (vol. 7, pp. 193-203).
5. Frangos, N. E., & Vrontos, S. D. (2001). Design of optimal bonus-malus systems with a frequency and a severity component on an individual basis in automobile insurance. Astin bulletin, 31, 1-22.
6. Syganov, A. A., Baskakov, V. N., & İazykov, A. D. (2019). Vlianie sistemy bonus-malus na tarifoobrazovanie pri obäzatelnom strahovanii otvetstvenosti vladelsev transporta v Rosii (osago). Prikladnaia ekonometrika, 56, 123-141 (in Russian).
7. Porädok primenenia sistemy "bonus-malus" v avtostrahovanii : podrobnoe rukovodstvo. (N.D.). Official website of the education department of the kudymkar city administration. Retrieved december 18, 2023, from https://kudobr.Ru (in Russian).
8. Bichsel, F. (1960). Une méthode pour calculer une ristourne adéquate pour années sans sinistres. Astin bulletin: the journal of the iaa, 3(1), 106-112 (in French).
9. Bidaibek, M. N. (2022). Aktualizasia strahovyh tarifov po obäzatelnomu strahovaniu grajdansko-pravovoi otvetstvenosti vladelsev transportnyh sredstv v Respublike Kazahstan s uchetom optimizasii sistemy "bonus-malus". Molodoi uchenyi, 10(405), 28-30 (in Russian).
10. Blagutin, D. İu. (2002). Fransuzski rejim vozmesenia ushcherba ot stihinyh bedstvi. Strahovoe delo, 11, 57-62 (in Russian).
11. Svedenia i materialy. (N.D.). Official website of the national bank of RK. Retrieved december 18, 2023, from https://www.Nationalbank.Kz (in Russian).
12. Pleşkov, A. P., & Orlova, I. V. (1997). Ocherki zarubejnogo strahovania. M.: Ankil. 200 p. (In Russian).
13. Growitsch, c., Et al. (2006). Risikoorientierte prämien differenzierung in der kfz-haftp
14. flichtversicherung – mehr prämiengerechtigkeit und weniger verkehrsunfälle? Zeitschrift für die gesamte versicherungswissenschaft, 95, 225-249 (in German).
15. Gubina, A. İu., & Sechko, V. V. (2008). Sistema bonus malus v avtomobilnom strahovanii [Система бонус-малус в автомобильном страховании]. In mejdunarodnaia nauchnaia konferensia «Teoriaveroiatnostei, sluchainye prosesy, matematicheskaia statistika i prilojenia» (pp. 57-64). Minsk. (In Russian).
16. Jilkina, M. (2000). Obäzatelnoe strahovanie: zarubejnaia praktika. Strahovoe revü, 3, 35-36 (in russian).
17. Aliev, R. (2000). Strahovoe regulirovanie v SSA : obzor. Strahovoe delo, 5, 18-35. (In Russian).
18. Bazanov, A. N., & Devidson, i̇V. (2005). Strahovanie lichnogo avtotransporta v SSA i Rosii. Kratki sravnitelnyi analiz. Strahovoe delo, 7, 55-58. (In Russian).
19. Kölık qūraldary ielerınıñ azamattyq-qūqyqtyq jauapkerşılıgın mındettı saqtandyru boiynşa saqtandyru syilyqaqysyn esepteu üşın «bonus-malus» jüiesı boiynşa koefi sienttı esepteu jäne qoldanu qağidalaryn bekıtu turaly. Qr qarjy naryğyn retteu jäne damytu agenttıgı basqarmasynyñ 23. 11. 2022 №102 Qaulysy. Ädılet. 2022. Retrieved december 18, 2023, from https://adilet.Zan.Kz/kaz/docs/v1600013928 (in Kazakh).
Review
For citations:
Bazarbayev A.O., Kupeshova B.K., Akpanbetova B.J. International practice of the bonus-malus system. Central Asian Economic Review. 2024;(2):147-159. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2024-2-147-159