Theory and methodology of formation of state development programs in conditions of economy transformation

The purpose of this study is to analyze problematic issues of state planning and management. Based on an analysis of domestic and world experience in project management, it is substantiated that the transition to project management technologies in the form of national priorities and national projects does not allow adequate achievement of planned results. To effectively solve the problem of transforming the economy into an innovative one, general approaches to constructing a new methodology for the formation and implementation of state development programs with a built-in intelligent decision support system are proposed.

Methodology. Content, retrospective, comparative analyzes of documents in the field of the state planning system were used; approaches of modern theory of economic systems, information economics and its applied solutions for managing socio-economic systems, methods of economic and mathematical modeling, principles of developing decision support systems, program and project management.

The originality /value of the research lies in the development/addition of the theory and methodology of forming a management system for state development programs of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the conditions of transformation of the economy into an innovative one.

Findings. Research results. Based on the analysis, a reasoned conclusion is given that Kazakhstan has not developed a systematic view of the system of state planning and management; the applied transition to project management methods, presented in the form of national projects, does not bring the expected results, which may complicate/fail to achieve the goals of state development programs and national projects for the development of a competitive and innovative economy based on the policy of its diversification. The authors make proposals for a scientifically based approach to solving this systemic problem in the form of a new methodology for the formation and implementation of state development programs with a built-in intelligent decision support system.

1. Tokayev, K.-J. (2023, September 1). Ekonomicheskiy kurs Spravedlivogo Kazahstana. Officia website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved October 2, 2023, from https://www.akorda.kz/ru/poslanie-glavy-gosudarstva-kasym-zhomarta-tokaeva-narodu-kazahstana-ekonomicheskiy-kursspravedlivogo-kazahstana-18588 (In Russian).

2. Sorokin, D. E. (Ed.), Akapkina, N. Y., & Nikiforova, L. V. (Eds.). (2023). Social'no-ekonomicheskie usloviya perekhoda k novoj modeli ekonomicheskogo rosta (Monograph). Moscow: Infra-M. (In Russian).

3. Shakina, E. (2008). Mnogourovnevaya ocenka celevyh programm kak metod upravleniya raskhodami regional'nyh i municipal'nyh byudzhetov. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki. (In Russian).

4. Kusainov, H. (2001). Aprel'skie tezisy dlya lyubogo vremeni goda. Ekonomika i statistika, (2), 13-16. (In Russian).

5. Alekhova, A. (2021, October). Zachem otchityvat'sya o proshlom, kogda vperedi budushchee? – Ashimbaev. 365 Info. Retrieved October 2, 2023, from https://365info.kz/2021/10/zachem-otchityvatsya-oproshlom-kogda-vperedi-budushhee-ashimbaev (In Russian).

6. Schetnyj komitet po kontrolyu za ispolneniem respublikanskogo byudzheta. (2020, May). Kratkoe zaklyuchenie k otchetu Pravitel'stva Respubliki Kazahstan ob ispolnenii respublikanskogo byudzheta za 2022 god (26 p.). (In Russian).

7. Govorkov, A. S. (2009). O nekotoryh problemah upravleniya proektami. Molodoj uchenyj, 3(3), 45-47.

8. Kulak, A. Y., & Horonzhevskij, Y. A. (2020). Razvitie i stanovlenie metodologij upravleniya proektami v Respublike Belarus' i za rubezhom. Sravnitel'nyj analiz. Vestnik Brestskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika, (3), 53-56. https://doi.org/10.36773/1818-1212-2020-121-3-53-56 (In Russian).

9. Ibadullaeva, A. (2023). Gosprogrammy, proekty i strategii: chem otlichayutsya oficial'nye dokumenty Kazahstana. Liter.kz. Retrieved October 2, 2023, from https://liter.kz/gosprogrammy-proekty-i-strategiichem-otlichaiutsia-ofitsialnye-dokumenty-kazakhstana-1673346904/ (In Russian)

10. Vechkinzova, E. A. (2008). Ocenka realizacii gosudarstvennyh programm razvitiya v Respublike Kazahstan. Izvestiya UrGEU, 1(20), 105-111 (In Russian).

11. Vechkinzova, E. A., Petrenko, E. S., Raimbekova, G. A., & Gelashvili, N. N. (2019). Issledovanie razvitiya informacionnoj sredy Respubliki Kazahstan. Voprosy innovacionnoj ekonomiki, 4(9), 1263-1278 (In Russian).

12. Klistorin, V. I., & Sedipkova, S. V. (2021). Analiz metodik ocenki gosudarstvennyh programm sub"ektov RF. Mir ekonomiki i upravleniya, 4(21), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2021-21-4-159-174 (In Russian).

13. Karpenko, E. M., Karpenko, V. M., & Golub, V. N. (2016). Issledovanie vliyaniya na prodolzhitel'nost' zhizni naseleniya razlichnyh social'no-ekonomicheskih faktorov. Ekonomicheskij vestnik universiteta. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov uchenyh i aspirantov, (30/1), 57-63 (In Russian).

14. Officia informational resource of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2021). Strategicheskij plan 2025 [Electronic resource]. Retrieved September 1, 2023, from https://primeminister.kz/ru/documents/gosprograms/stratplan-2025 (In Russian).

15. The Atlas of Economic Complexity. (2023). Country & Product Complexity Rankings. Retrieved September 1, 2023, from https://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/rankings.

16. Ickovic, G. (2011). Model' trojnoj spirali. Innovacii, 4, 5-10 (In Russian).

17. Klejner, G. B. (2015). Gosudarstvo – region – otrasl' – predpriyatie: karkas sistemnoj ustojchivosti ekonomiki Rossii. Ekonomika regiona, 2, 50-58 (In Russian).

18. National project "Tekhnologicheskij ryvok za schet cifrovizacii, nauki i innovacij". (2021). Ob utverzhdenii nacional'nogo proekta "Tekhnologicheskij ryvok za schet cifrovizacii, nauki i innovacij". Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Respubliki Kazahstan ot 12 oktyabrya 2021 goda № 727. Adіlet. Retrieved November 2, 2023, from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2100000727 (In Russian).

19. Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan & Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2021). O nekotoryh voprosah nacional'nyh proektov. Sovmestnyj prikaz Ministra nacional'noj ekonomiki Respubliki Kazahstan ot 11 avgusta 2021 goda № 79 i Predsedatelya Agentstva po strategicheskomu planirovaniyu i reformam Respubliki Kazahstan ot 12 avgusta 2021 goda. Adіlet. Retrieved November 2, 2023, from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2100023968 (In Russian).

20. Uandykova, M. (2021). Sistemnoe modelirovanie processov formirovaniya i realizacii programm innovacionnogo razvitiya regionov: dissertaciya na soiskanie uchenoj doktora ekonomicheskih nauk (Specialty 08.00.13; 08.00.05). Moscow: FGOBU VO Finansovyj universitet pri Pravitel'stve Rossijskoj Federacii. (In Russian).

21. Lima Jr, O., Fernandes, G., & Tereso, A. (2023). Benefits of adopting innovation and sustainability practices in project management within the SME context. Sustainability, 15(18), Article 13411. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813411.

22. Klejner, G. B., Shchepetova, S. E., & Lapina, M. A. (2019). Sistemnye mekhanizmy koordinacii v innovacionnoj ekonomike (G. B. Klejner, Ed.). Moscow: Knorus (In Russian).

23. McGregor, J. A., & Pouw, N. (2017). Towards an economics of well-being. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(4), 1123-1142. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew044.

24. Su, Y.–S., & Chen, J. (2015). Introduction to regional innovation systems in East Asia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, 80-82.

25. Costanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., & Giovannini, E. (2014). Development: Time to leave GDP behind. Nature News, 7483(505), 283-285. https://doi.org/10.1038/505283a.

26. Martin, B. R. (2016). Twenty challenges for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 432-450. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv077.

27. Lisin, A., Shvandar, K., Meynkhard, A., Uandykova, M., Litvishko, O., & Tabachkova, X. (2021). Digital trading applications and bank performance: evidence from Russia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), Article 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030194.

28. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2017). National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 997-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8.

29. Christensen, M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015, December). What is disruptive innovation? [Electronic resource]. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved September 28, 2023, from https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation.

30. Swann, G. M. P. (2014). Common Innovation: How We Create the Wealth of Nations. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

31. Li-Hua, R. (2014). Competitiveness of Chinese firms: West meets East. London: Palgrave Macmillan

32. Chen, J., Yin, X., & Mei, L. (2018). Holistic Innovation: An Emerging Innovation Paradigm. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2, 1-13.

33. Bergman, E. M., & Feser, E. J. (2020). Industrial and Regional Clusters: Concepts and Comparative Applications. Morganton: West Virginia University.

34. Kapsali, M. (2011). Systems Thinking in Innovation Project Management: A Match That Works. International Journal of Project Management, 29(4), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.01.003.

35. Cowan, R., & Zinovyeva, N. (2013). University effects on regional innovation. Research Policy, 42(3), 788-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.001.

36. Uandykova, M. K. (2019). Modeli i metody realizacii programmy innovacionnogo razvitiya regiona. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo, 1(50), 131-137 (In Russian).