INTELLECTUAL ECONOMIC FACTOR ROSVITATION

The purpose of the research – the development of leading countries of the world has led to the formation of a new economy - knowledge economy, innovation, global information systems, intellectual labor economics, science, and new technologies. Today, complex studies on various aspects of social development are relevant when Kazakhstan enters a new phase of its development. The main purpose of the research is to study the role of innovation potential today at the foreign and domestic levels, to identify the factors that affect the problem, and identify the ways of development.
The methodological basis of the study was based on a variety of modern analytical, economic and statistical analysis methods, a systematic approach, methods of analogy, comparative and expert assessments, statistical data processing.
Originality / value of the research. One of such topical issues concerning every citizen of Kazakhstan is the problem of formation and development of intellectual nation - the support of our state, the basis for further development and prosperity of our country. This problem is multifaceted, it covers many areas, such as the formation of an intellectual society in Kazakhstan, the multiplication of the national intellectual potential in the formation of a rich intellectual nation, the formation of an intellectual citizen of the country.
Findings. The article highlights its development in different countries, as well as existing problems. The ways and methods of their decision on the basis of various analytical indicators on this subject are described. The definition of intellectual potential in the interpretation of various authors is given. In this paper, the main trends in the development of the world intellectual potential in our country in the context of globalization were analyzed. The analysis of the level of intellectual property development to date, as well as the prospects that exist in this area under the influence of certain qualitative factors.

1. Oficial'nyj sajt Prezidenta Respubliki Kazahstan Poslanie narodu Kazahstana [Electronic source] // Jelektronnye tekstovye dannye – URL: http://www.akorda.kz (accessed: February 6, 2019) (in Russian).

2. Nusratullin, V. (2004), “Jekonomicheskij analiz s pozicii teorii neravnovesija”, Zhurnal. Obshhestvo i jekonomika, No. 9, pp. 16–28. (in Russian).

3. Ivancov, V. A. (2003), “Intellektual'nyj potencial, faktory ego ispol'zovanija”, Intellektual'nyj potencial, Kazan', pp. 18–24 (in Russian).

4. Martynov, A. F. (2008), “Vosproizvodstvo intellektual'nogo potenciala: ocenka, modelirovanie, metodologija upravlenija”, Moscow, pp. 5–47. (in Russian).

5. Trapeznikov, S. P. (1976), “Intellektual'nyj potencial kommunizma”, Politicheskaja literatura, pp. 118–134 (in Russian).

6. Eljutin, V. P. (1980), “Intellektual'nyj potencial obshhestva”, Vysshaja shkola obshhestva razvitogo socializma, Moscow, 102 p. (in Russian).

7. “Valovyj vnutrennij produkt strany” (2019), Komitet po statistike Ministerstva nacional'noj jekonomiki Respubliki Kazahstan, available at: http://stat.gov.kz/official/dinamic (accessed: February 5, 2019) (in Russian).

8. “Razrabotki i issledovanija valovogo vnutrennego produkta” (2015), Unesco science report, available at: http://www.unesco.org (accessed: February 5, 2019) (in Russian).

9. Aul'bekova, A. (2018), “Nenauchnyj podhod”, Forbes Kazakhstan, available at: https://forbes.kz/process/nenauchnyiy_podhod/ (accessed: February 6, 2019) (in Russian).

10. Bontis, N. and Wu, S. (2005), “Tiger” Brainpower: Taiwan’s Intellectual Capital Development”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, No. 6 (2), pp. 23–58.

11. Andriessen, D. and Stam, C. (2004), “The Intellectual Capital of the European Union”, Journal Measuring the Lisbon Agenda, pp. 23–30.

12. Firer, S. and Williams, S. M. (2003), “Intellectual Capital and Traditional Measures of Corporate Performance”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, No. 4 (3), pp. 348–360.

13. Kujansivu, P. (2006), “Intellectual Capital Performance in Finnish Companies”, Journal Institute of Industrial Management, Tampere University of Technology, No. 56 (4), pp. 56–88.

14. Manuelli, R. and Seshadri, A. (2006), “Human Capital and the Wealth of Nations”, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison. (Society for Economic Dynamics, 2005 Meeting Papers), pp. 2736–2761.

15. Subramaniam, M. and Youndt, M. A. (2005). “The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative”, Capabilities Academy of Management Journal, No. 48 (3), pp. 403–421.