MECHANISM FOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF INTE LLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS

Purpose of the study – determining t he elemen ts of the mechanism that will further contribute to the disclosure of the modern mechanism of organizational and economic relations in the commercial ization of inte llectual property objects (hereinafter referred to as IPOs) in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Development of ways to improve and support the development of the innovation sphere in the Republic of Kazakhstan, using domestic features of the development of the intellectual property market and foreign experience of the mechanism under study.
Methodology – In the study is formed a toolbox of general economic theory, modern economic literature, various approaches to determine the mechanism of organizational and economic relations in the commercialization of intellectual property. The situational approach is used and the legislative base is structured to consider the mechanism of commercialization of intellectual property and other general scientific methods that allow to reveal the mechanism under study.
Originality / value of the research: Based on scientific approaches and analysis of the domestic legislative base, the article proposes a modern definition of the mechanism of organizational and economic relations in the commercialization of intellectual property rights, and considers a model of the mechanism.
Findings is understanding of the individual elements of the modern mechanism of organizational and economic relations during the commercialization of intellectual property in the Republic of Kazakhstan will accelerate the process of creating an innovative type of economy.

1. Vasılenko, N. V. (2016), “Tehnologıı ı organızatsıonno-ekonomıcheskıe mehanızmy ıh kommertsıalızatsıı v ýslovııah sovremennoı ekonomıkı”, Fýndamentalnye issledovanııa, No. 4-1, pp. 129–133 (in Russian).

2. Gordeev, S. E. (2014), “Formırovanıe organızatsıonno-ekonomıcheskogo mehanızma kommertsıalızatsıı ınnovatsıı v promyshlennostı Rossıı”, Vestnık Ekaterınınskogo ınstıtýta, No. 3 (27), pp. 35–41 (in Russian).

3. Emırova, A. E. (2016), “Innovatsıonnye tehnologıı v organızatsıonno-ekonomıcheskıh mehanızmah razvıtııa transporta”, Naýchnyı jýrnal NIÝ ITMO. Serııa: Ekonomıka ı ekologıcheskıı menedjment, No. 1, pp. 137–143 (in Russian).

4. Smırnov, E. B. and Balyhin, M. G. (2015), “Kontseptsııa ı sostav organızatsıonno-ekonomıcheskogo mehanızma kommertsıalızatsıı rezýltatov ıntellektýalnoı deıatelnostı v vysshem ýchebnom zavedenıı”, Vestnık grajdanskıh ınjenerov, No. 5 (52), pp. 306–318 (in Russian).

5. Kýharýk, A. D. (2013), “Soderjanıe organızatsıonno-ekonomıcheskogo mehanızma povyshenııa konkýrentosposobnostı predprııatııa”, Vestnık Kemerovskogo gosýdarstvennogo ýnıversıteta, No. 2-1 (54), pp. 283–287 (in Russian).

6. Ýdaltsova, N. L. (2012), “Organızatsıonno-ekonomıcheskıı mehanızm fýnktsıonırovanııa otraslı natsıonalnoı ekonomıkı”, Ekonomıcheskıe naýkı, No. 91, pp. 94–98 (in Russian).

7. Týrko, D. A. (2013), “Analız metodıcheskıh podhodov k formırovanııý organızatsıonno-ekonomıcheskogo mehanızma prınıatııa reshenıı v vysokotehnologıchnom proızvodstve”, Sovremennaıa naýka: aktýalnye problemy teorıı ı praktıkı. Serııa: Ekonomıka ı parvo, No. 1-2, pp. 32–38 (in Russian).

8. Ýrazbaeva, N. A. (2007), “Intellektýalnaıa sobstvennost v ındýstrıalno – ınnovatsıonnoı sfere Respýblıkı Kazahstan: mehanızmy formırovanııa ı sovershenstvovanııa”, Almaty, Kazak ýnıversıteti, 295 p. (in Russian).

9. Novıkov, A. V. (2011), “Sovremennyı vzglıad na organızatsıonno-ekonomıcheskıı mehanızm ýpravlenııa rossııskım predprııatıem”, Naýchnyı jýrnal NIÝ ITMO. Serııa: Ekonomıka ı ekologıcheskıı menedjment, No. 1, pp. 167–176 (in Russian).

10. Smırnov, E. B. and Balyhin, M. G. (2015), “Kontseptsııa ı sostav organızatsıonno-ekonomıcheskogo mehanızma kommertsıalızatsıı rezýltatov ıntellektýalnoı deıatelnostı v vysshem ýchebnom zavedenıı”, Vestnık grajdanskıh ınjenerov, No. 5 (52), pp. 306–318 (in Russian).

11. Nıgmatýllına, L. G. (2004), “Kommertsıalızatsııa ıntellektýalnoı sobstvennostı v perehodnoı ekonomıke”, Kazan, Kazanskıı gosýdarstvennyı tehnıcheskıı ýnıversıtet ım. A.N. Týpoleva, 39 p. (in Russian)

12. “Zakon Respýblıkı Kazahstan ot 31 oktıabrıa 2015 goda № 381-V «O kommertsıalızatsıı rezýltatov naýchnoı ı (ılı) naýchno-tehnıcheskoı deıatelnostı»” (s ızmenenııamı ot 04.07.2018 g.), available at: https://www.zakon.kz/4755831-opublikovan-zakon-rk-o-kommercializacii.html (accessed: October 13, 2019) (in Russian).

13. “Postanovlenıe Pravıtelstva Respýblıkı Kazahstan ot 28 oktıabrıa 2004 goda № 1111 Voprosy Mınısterstva obrazovanııa ı naýkı Respýblıkı Kazahstan (s ızmenenııamı ı dopolnenııamı po sostoıanııý na 13.06.2019 g.)”, available at: // https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1051308#pos=2;-44&sdoc_params (accessed: October 13, 2019) (in Russian).

14. Dias, A. A. and Porto, G. S. (2018), “Technology transfer management in the context of a developing country: evidence from Brazilian universities”, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, No. 16 (4), pp. 525–536.

15. Bansi, R. (2018), “Management of innovation – Constraints on commercialization of university innovation: Evidence from SA”, Proceedings of the European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE, pp. 87–93.

16. Han, J. (2017), “Technology commercialization through sustainable knowledge sharing from universityindustry collaborations, with a focus on patent propensity”, Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, CSIT, pp. 75–82.

17. Timanjuk, V. and Chernenko, Y. (2018), “Technological innovation strategy: how do technology life cycles change by technological area”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), Special Issue 3, pp. 519–523.

18. Baımýratov, Ý. (2005), “Dengı ı fınansy: nelıneınaıa sıstema: naýchno-popýlıarnoe ızdanıe”, Almaty, Ekonomıka, ch. 3, 320 p. (in Russian).

19. Byun, J., Sung, T.-E. and Park, H. (2018), “Technological innovation strategy: how do technology life cycles change by technological area”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, No. 30(1), pp. 98–112.