Preview

Central Asian Economic Review

Advanced search

INFRASTRUCTURAL SECURITY AND DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM IN RURAL AREAS OF KAZAKHSTAN: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS

https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2022-1-17-29

Abstract

Purpose of the research – comparative analysis of the level of infrastructure provision in rural areas of Kazakhstan, which allows to determine the strategic directions of its development.

Methodology – a systematic approach to studying the problems of infrastructure security; methods of statistical and economic analysis. The research is based on the fundamental provisions of the concepts and hypotheses presented in classical and modern studies of foreign and domestic scientists, based on the system-functional approach, as well as software developments of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the field of regional development. This study is based on the use of methods of systemic, comparative and cluster analysis, methods of classification and grouping, multivariate statistical analysis, which made it possible to carry out a comparative analysis of the provision of rural areas of Kazakhstan with infrastructure, to group regions, which made it possible to determine the strategic directions for the development of infrastructure in rural areas of the country. To process the initial statistical information, the "Classification Analysis" package of the "IBM SPSS Statistics" application was used.

Originality / value of the research – lies in the fact that the comparative analysis of the level of provision of rural areas in the regions of Kazakhstan with basic infrastructure makes it possible to differentiate the regions of the country by the level of infrastructure provision and determine the priority directions of its development, which ultimately will provide them with tourist attractiveness. The findings of the study may be of interest in the development and implementation of programs for the socio-economic development of regions, the development of the tourism industry, as well as for the implementation of scientific research on the integrated development of rural settlements by government bodies.

Findings – A comparative analysis of the infrastructural provision of rural areas of Kazakhstan made it possible to identify existing problems in ensuring transport accessibility of destinations, a low level of provision of utilities and social infrastructure, which determines the unattractiveness of rural areas as tourist destinations and low demand from potential tourists.

About the Authors

A. T. Tleuberdinova
Institute of economics Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

Almaty



K. V. Kulik
Turan University
Kazakhstan

Almaty



V. B. Kulik
Turan University
Kazakhstan

Almaty



References

1. Chislennost' naseleniya Respubliki Kazahstan. (n.d.). Website of Agency for Strategic planning and reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan Bureau of National statistics. Retrieved April 15, 2021, from https://stat.gov.kz/official/industry/61/statistic/8 (In Russian).

2. Yerdavletov, S. R., Artemev, A. M. and Ajzholova, G. R. (2012). Aktual'nye problemy formirovaniya sovremennoj industrii turizma Kazahstana. Economy of Eurasia: Proceedings of the international scientificpractical conference. Almaty, 41-48 (In Russian).

3. Smykova, M. R. (2010). Issledovanie strategicheskih ekonomicheskih zon i konkurentosposobnosti turprodukta Kazahstana. Almaty Management University website. Retrieved April 15, 2021, from https://www.almau.edu.kz/smykova_mr-955 (In Russian).

4. Duysen, G. M. (2012). Osnovy formirovaniya i razvitiya industrii turizma v Kazahstane. «LEM» Publishing house, Almaty, 94 p. (In Russian).

5. Nikitinskiy, E. S. and Vukolov, V. N. (2006). Formirovanie industrii turizma v Kazahstane za gody gosudarstvennoj nezavisimosti. Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Tourism and Sports, Kazakh Academy of Sports and Tourism. Proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference. Astana, 215-220 (In Russian).

6. Namazbayeva, Z. E. and Aktymbayeva, A. S. (2019). Rekreacionnoe rajonirovanie territorii Vostochno- Kazahstanskoj oblasti. Vestnik VGU, Seriya: Geografiya, Geoekologiya, 4, 31-37 (In Russian).

7. Tasbolat, B., Pyharyev, A. N. and Mamadiyarov, M. D. (2007). Geografiya turizma: potencial turistskorekreacionnyh resursov Velikogo Shelkovogo puti (Yuzhno-Kazahstanskaya oblast). M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Shymkent, 31 p.

8. Kaspakbayev, K. S. and Almahan, Z. Yu. (2021). Kak razvivaetsya transportnaya otrasl' Kazahstana. Promyshlennyj transport Kazahstana, 1, 222- 231 (In Russian).

9. Kaplan, E. T., Serbaeva, N. Ya., Kochetkov, A. V. and Bekmagambetova, G. M. (2020). Kompleksnyj podhod k opredeleniyu putej povysheniya effektivnosti transportno-logisticheskoj sistemy Respubliki Kazahstan. Vestnik Evrazijskoj nauki, 12(1), 14ECVN120, Retrieved from https://esj.today/PDF/14ECVN120.pdf (In Russian).

10. Akhmetova, Sh. and Akhmetov, K. D. (2013). Sovremennoe sostoyanie transportnoj sistemy. Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference «Industrial and innovative development of transport, transport equipment and mechanical engineering», KazNTU, Almaty, 64-66 (In Russian).

11. Perales, R. (2002). Rural tourism in Spain. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(4), 1101-1110, DOI: 10/1016/S0160-7383(02)00025-7.

12. Sharpley, R. (2003). Tourism, modernisation and development on the Island of Cyprus. Challenges and policy responses. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 11(2/3), 246-265, DOI: 10.1080/09669580308667205.

13. Liu, A. (2006). Tourism in rural areas: Kedah, Malaysia. Tourism Management, 27, 878-889, DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.05.007.

14. Sharpley, R. and Vass, A. (2006). Tourism, farming and diversification: An attitudinal study. Tourism Management, 27(5), 1040-1052, DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.10.025.

15. Fons, S., Fierro, M. and Patino, G. (2011). Rural tourism: A sustainable alternative. Applied Energy, 88(2), 551-557, DOI: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2010.08.031.

16. Berkel, D. and Verburg, P. (2011). Sensitising rural policy: assessing spatial variation in rural development options for Europe. Land Use Policy, 28(3), 447-459, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.09.002.

17. Pina, I. and Delfa, M. (2005). Rural tourism demand by type of accommodation. Tourism Management, 26(6), 951-959, DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2004.06.013.

18. Almeida, А. and Pinto Machado, L. (2021). Rural Development and Rural Tourism: The Impact of Infrastructure Investments. In Book: Peripheral Territories, Tourism, and Regional Development. London, UK, IntechOpen, 1-21, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.95610.

19. Zasada, I. and Piorr, A. (2015). The role of local framework conditions for the adoption of Rural Development Policy: an example of diversification, tourism development and village renewal in Brandenburg, Germany. Ecological Indicators, 59, 82-93, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.002.

20. Sharpley, R. (2002). Rural tourism and the challenge of tourism diversification: The case of Cyprus. Tourism Management, 23, 233-244, DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00078-4.

21. Saxena, G. and Ilbery, B. (2010). Developing integrated rural tourism: actor practices in the English/ Welsh border. Journal of Rural Studies, 26, 260-271, DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.12.001

22. Cawley, M. and Gillmor, D. (2008). Integrated rural tourism, Concepts and Practice. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(2), 316-327, DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2007.07.011.

23. Snieška, V., Barkauskienė, K. and Barkauskas, V. (2014). The impact of economic factors on the development of rural tourism: Lithuanian case. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 280–285, DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.189.

24. Aytuğ, H. and Mikaeili, M. (2017). Evaluation of Hopa’s Rural Tourism Potential in the Context of European Union Tourism Policy. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 37, 234-245, DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.039.

25. Gunn, C. A. (1988). Tourism Planning (second edition). Taylor & Francis, New York, 357 р.

26. Inskeep, E. (1991). Tourism Planning: An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold. 508 p.

27. Crouch, G. I. and Ritchie, J. R. B. (2000). The competitive destination: a sustainability perspective. Tourism Management, 21(1), 1-7, DOI: 10.1079/9780851996646.0000.

28. Murphy, P., Pritchard, M. P. and Smith, B. (2000). The destination product and its impact on traveller perceptions. Tourism Management, 1(21), 43-52, DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00080-1.

29. Dwyer, L. and Forsyth, P. (2008). Economic measures of tourism yield: what markets to target? International Journal of Tourism Research, 2(10), 155-168, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.648.

30. Smith, S. L. J. (1994). The Tourism Product. Annals of Tourism Research, 3, 582-595, DOI: 10.1016/0160-7383(94)90121-X.

31. Khadaroo, J. (2008). Role of Transport Infrastructure in International Tourism Development: A Gravity Model Approach. Tourism Management, 29(5), 831-840, DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.09.005.

32. Albalate, D., Campos, J. and Jimenez, J. L. (2017). Tourism and high-speed rail in Spain: Does the AVE increase local visitors. Annals of Tourism Research, 65, 71-82, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.05.004.

33. Rehman Khan, S. A., Qianli, D., SongBo, W., Zaman, K. and Zhang, Y. (2017). Travel and tourism competitiveness index: The impact of air transportation, railways transportation, travel and transport services on international inbound and outbound tourism. Journal of Air Transport Management, 58, 125-134, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.10.006.

34. Bil, M., Bilova, M. and Kubiček, J. (2012). Unified GIS database on cycle tourism infrastructure. Tourism Management, 6(33), 1554-1561, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.03.002.

35. Olafsdottir, R. and Runnstrom, M. C. (2013). Assessing hiking trails condition in two popular tourist destinations in the Icelandic highlands. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 3-4, 57-67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2013.09.004.

36. Mo, C., Howard, D. R. and Havitz, M. E. (1993). Testing an international tourist role typology. Annals of Tourism Research, 20, 319-335, DOI: 10.1016/0160-7383(93)90058-B.

37. Kumar Das, S. and Naskar, K. (2018). Nexus between Infrastructure and Tourism Development. Socio Economic Challenges, 2(2), 6-12, DOI: 10.21272/sec.2(1).6-12.2018.

38. Mandic, A., Mrnjavac, Ž. and Kordić, L. (2018). Tourism Infrastructure, Recreational Facilities and Tourism Development. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 24(1), 1-22, DOI: 10.20867/thm.24.1.12.

39. Gosudarstvennaya programma infrastrukturnogo razvitiya Respubliki Kazahstan «Nurly Zhol» na 2020–2025 gg. (2019). Official information resource of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved July 25, 2021, from https://primeminister.kz/assets/media/gosudarstvennaya-programma-nrly-zholrus.pdf (In Russian).

40. The official answer of acting Director of the Department of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan n/a from 13.08.2021.


Review

For citations:


Tleuberdinova A.T., Kulik K.V., Kulik V.B. INFRASTRUCTURAL SECURITY AND DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM IN RURAL AREAS OF KAZAKHSTAN: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS. Central Asian Economic Review. 2022;(1):17-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2022-1-17-29

Views: 628


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2789-4398 (Print)
ISSN 2789-4401 (Online)