Ways to improve the efficiency of the public procurement market of the Republic of Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.52821/2224-5561-2021-3-77-89
Abstract
Purpose of research. Development of theoretical and methodological provisions and economically sound proposals to improve the efficiency of the public procurement system of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Methodology. In the course of the study, various methods of general scientific knowledge, comparative analysis, economic and statistical analysis were used.
Originality / value of research. The results of the study can be used in the development of regional target programs for socio-economic development, amendments and additions to the legislative and regulatory acts regulating the processes of state procurement.
Research results. Through the application of appropriate research methods, the conceptual foundations of the public procurement market are disclosed, the evolution of the public procurement system of the Republic of Kazakhstan is tracked, a comparative analysis of Kazakhstani and foreign experience in building this system is carried out, the main problems of the public procurement market functioning are identified and theoretical and methodological provisions and economically sound proposals are developed. to improve its efficiency.
About the Authors
R. K. YelshibayevKazakhstan
Almaty
S. A. Kozhabaeva
Kazakhstan
Nur-Sultan
B. T. Beisengaliyev
Kazakhstan
Nur-Sultan
References
1. Makhmutova, M. (2019). Gosudarstvennyye zakupki: zakonodatelnaya osnova i ekonomicheskiye mekhanizmy realizatsii, Almaty, 356 p. (In Russian).
2. Gadzhiyev, F. A. (2018), Programmnoye obespecheniye konkursnykh zakupok TRU dlya gosudarstvennykh nuzhd. Bulletin of the Kazakh University of Economics, Finance and International Trade, 1, 7–13 (In Russian).
3. Niyazov, A. A. (2018). Povysheniye effektivnosti sistemy konkursnykh zakupok: monografiya, Karaganda, 243 p. (In Russian).
4. Zhunusova, E. D. (2020). Effektivnost razmeshcheniya gosudarstvennykh zakazov: analitika. Materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference of the Faculty of Economics M. H. Dulati, 127–132 (In Russian).
5. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyn memlekettik satyp alu turaly zany (2015), Adilet. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from http://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/Z1500000434 (In Kazakh).
6. Guijarro, L. (2010). ICT standardisation and public procurement in the United States and in the European Union: Influence on eGovernment deployment. Telecommunications Policy, 5-6, 285–295
7. White, E. M. and Carver, A. D. (2014). Modeling timber mill procurement influence effects on interstate sawlog exportation. Forest Policy and Economics, 6(6), 529–537.
8. Rolfstam, M. (2015). Optimal crude oil procurement under fluctuating price in an oil refinery. European Journal of Operational Research, 245(2. 1), 438–445.
9. Castro, L. I. and Frutos, M-A. (2010). How to translate results from auctions to procurements. Economics Letters, 106(2), 115–128.
10. Arve, M. (2014). Procurement and predation: Dynamic sourcing from financially constrained suppliers. Journal of Public Economics, 120, 157–168.
11. The number of visitors to the Public Procurement portal of the Republic of Kazakhstan (n.d.). Public procurement portal of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from www.goszakup.gov.kz
12. Analytical r eport (n.d.). Development Bank of Kazakhstan JSC, Retrieved May 15, 2021, from www.kdb.kz
13. Naoum, Sh. and Egbu, Ch. (2015). Critical Review of Procurement Method Research in Construction Journals. Procedia Economics and Finance, 21, 6–17.
14. Nurumov, A. (2019). Gosudarstvennyy zakaz kak instrument regulirovaniya predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti. Bulletin of Al-Farabi KazNU, 4, 214–219 (In Russian).
15. Li, Zh., Ryan, J. K. and Sun, D. (2015). Multi-attribute procurement contracts. International Journal of Innovation Economics, 159, 137–146.
Review
For citations:
Yelshibayev R.K., Kozhabaeva S.A., Beisengaliyev B.T. Ways to improve the efficiency of the public procurement market of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Central Asian Economic Review. 2021;(3):77-89. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.52821/2224-5561-2021-3-77-89