Preview

Central Asian Economic Review

Advanced search

Strategic priorities for Kazakhstan’s development in global value chains of critical minerals

https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2025-6-101-111

Abstract

Purpose of the research – to analyze the role of critical minerals in diversifying Kazakhstan’s economy and to assess the country’s strategy for moving to higher levels of global value chains.

Methodology – a comprehensive assessment of factors influencing Kazakhstan’s positioning in critical mineral supply chains was conducted using a systematic literature review, PESTEL analysis of the external environment, SWOT analysis of internal factors, and the TOWS strategic matrix.

Originality / value of the study – the authors integrate geopolitical analysis with an economic assessment of the potential for developing Kazakhstan’s processing industries in the context of the global energy transition. The study explores opportunities for the country to advance in global critical mineral value chains through the application of the TOWS matrix for the formation of targeted strategic initiatives.

Findings – it was determined that despite having 124 deposits of rare earth elements and significant reserves of critical minerals, Kazakhstan’s share of high-tech exports remains only 26.9%. The study substantiates that to advance in global value chains, Kazakhstan must overcome technological barriers and strengthen international cooperation. A matrix of strategic initiatives (TOWS) has been developed, including the creation of joint ventures with technology leaders, diversification of export markets, engagement of international partners for technology transfer, and transition to a green economy.

About the Authors

G. M. Aubakirova
Abylkas Saginov Karaganda Technical University
Kazakhstan

Karaganda



P. K. Salibekova
Almaty Management University
Kazakhstan

Almaty



G. B. Isataeva
Uzbekali Zhanibekov South Kazakhstan Pedagogical University
Kazakhstan

Shymkent



References

1. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2024). Global critical minerals outlook 2024. Paris: International Energy Agency. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2024

2. Ministry of Industry and Mineral Resources, Saudi Arabia. (2024). Saudi Arabia mineral resources overview. Retrieved from https://www.mim.gov.sa/

3. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2024). World investment report 2024: Investment flows to Africa by country and region. Geneva: United Nations.

4. U.S. Geological Survey. (2024). Mineral commodity summaries 2024. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.

5. Schulz, K. J., De Young, J. H. Jr., Seal, R. R. II, & Bradley, D. C. (2017). Critical mineral resources of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1802. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.

6. Nassar, N. T., Wilburn, D. R., & Goonan, T. G. (2022). Byproduct metal requirements for U.S. wind and solar photovoltaic electricity generation. Applied Energy, 312, 118711.

7. Mudd, G. M., Werner, T. T., Jowitt, S. M., Wiedenbeck, M., Yellishetty, M., & Yuan, S. (2023). Critical minerals and energy: Impacts and limitations of the energy transition. Applied Earth Science, 132(1), 13–26.

8. Zhou, B., Li, Z., & Chen, C. (2017). Global potential of rare earth resources and rare earth demand from clean technologies. Minerals, 7(11), 203.

9. Guo, Q., & Wang, Y. (2024). Rare earth trade dependence network structure and its impact on trade prices: An industry chain perspective. Resources Policy, 91, 104930.

10. Xu-guang, Z., Xue-hong, Z., & Jin-yu, C. (2022). Trade dependence network structure of tantalum trade goods and its effect on trade prices. Resources Policy, 79, 103065.

11. Schumacher, K. A., & Green, M. L. (2023). Circular economy in a high-tech world. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3, 619–642.

12. Lukas, B., Pescatori, A., & Stuermer, M. (2024). Energy transition metals: Bottleneck for net-zero emissions? Journal of the European Economic Association, 22(1), 200–229.

13. Agusdinata, D. B., & Liu, W. (2023). Global sustainability of electric vehicles minerals: A critical review of news media. The Extractive Industries and Society, 13, 101231.

14. Research Nester Analytics. (2024). Global rare earth metals market analysis & forecast 2023–2035. New York: Research Nester Analytics.

15. Komitet geologii Ministerstva industrii i infrastrukturlnogo razvitiya Respubliki Kazakhstan. (2024). Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya mineralno-syr'evoi bazy redkozemelnykh metallov Kazakhstana [State and prospects for the development of Kazakhstan’s rare-earth mineral base]. Astana: MIIR RK. [in Russian].

16. Komitet po statistike Ministerstva natsionalnoi ekonomiki Respubliki Kazakhstan. (2025). Statistika promyshlennosti [Industry statistics]. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.kz [in Russian].

17. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2023). Global innovation index 2024: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. Geneva: WIPO.

18. Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC). (2024). Kazakhstan country profile 2024. Retrieved from https://oec.world/en/profile/country/kaz


Review

For citations:


Aubakirova G.M., Salibekova P.K., Isataeva G.B. Strategic priorities for Kazakhstan’s development in global value chains of critical minerals. Central Asian Economic Review. 2025;(6):101-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2025-6-101-111

Views: 94

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2789-4398 (Print)
ISSN 2789-4401 (Online)