Urban ecotourism development: the case of the «MAZE» Ecopark in Oskemen
https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2025-4-162-178
Abstract
The study aims. This study addresses severe environmental degradation in Ust-Kamenogorsk by developing the “MAZE Ecopark,” an innovative urban ecotourism model that integrates sustainable tourism, ecological restoration, and environmental education.
Methodology. A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining GIS-based spatial and environmental analysis, a pilot sociological survey (n≈80), cost-benefit and visitor-flow modeling, 3D visualization, and expert consultations. These tools allowed evaluation of environmental conditions, community demand, and preliminary economic viability.
Originality/value of the research. This is the first ecopark framework specifically designed for post-industrial cities in Central Asia. Unlike traditional urban parks, the model combines maze-design principles with ecological remediation and educational programming, linking recreation with sustainability and community engagement.
Key findings. Results confirm: (1) serious environmental degradation, with air quality indicators exceeding WHO standards and limited green infrastructure; (2) strong public support and willingness to engage in urban ecotourism; and (3) financial feasibility, with potential to attract substantial visitor flows and achieve mediumterm payback. The expected impact includes ecological improvements (air-quality mitigation, urban greening), social benefits (public health, environmental literacy, social cohesion), and economic contributions (tourism revenue, new jobs).
Keywords
About the Authors
Y. R. DauletkhanovaKazakhstan
Dauletkhanova Yerkezhan Ruslankyzy – PhD student, Department of Recreational Geography and Tourism
Almaty
A. S. Aktymbayeva
Kazakhstan
Aktymbayeva Aliya Sagyndykovna – Candidate of Geography, Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences
Almaty
A. Z. Sapiyeva
Kazakhstan
Sapiyeva Akmaral Zhenisbayevna – PhD, Department of Recreational Geography and Tourism
Almaty
References
1. Higham, J., & Lück, M. (2002). Urban ecotourism: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Ecotourism, 1(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724040208668112
2. Dodds, R., & Joppe, M. (2001). Promoting urban green tourism: The development of the other map of Toronto. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 7(3), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/135676670100700306
3. Wu, J., & Tan, R. (2012). Urban green space planning based on ecological service values: A case study on Shenzhen City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) UP.1943-5444.0000103
4. Chen, W. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2008). Cost–benefit analysis of the leisure value of urban greening in the new Chinese city of Zhuhai. Cities, 25(5), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2008.06.002
5. Gibson, A., et al. (2003). Ecotourism in the city? Toronto’s Green Tourism Association. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 15(6), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110310488075
6. Aktymbayeva, B., et al. (2020). Tourism industry development and governance: A comparative stage review of Kazakhstan’s experience for the years of independence, 1991–2020. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 34(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.34109-616
7. Forman, R. T. T. (2014). Urban ecology: Science of cities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Costanza, R., et al. (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
9. Hunter, C. (1997). Sustainable tourism as an adaptive paradigm. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(97)00036-4
10. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Nikulina, A. A. (2021). Urban ecotourism as a new direction of ecotourism. In Tourism and Hospitality: New Concepts, Opportunities and Development Tools (pp. 88–91).
12. Burabay (Borovoe) tourist stream. (2025). Forbes Georgia. Retrieved August 20, 2025 from https://forbes.ge/uploads/files/ENG-kazakh-geo.pdf
13. Planting and survival statistics. (2025). Inbusiness.kz. Retrieved April 3, 2025 from https://inbusiness.kz/ru/news/v-vko-poteryali-schet-derevyam
14. Spruce. (2025). Lizgard. Retrieved April 3, 2025 from https://lizgard.com.ua/rasteniya/khvojnyerastenija/eli.html
15. Yew. (2025). Vash Sad. Retrieved February 3, 2025 from https://www.vashsad.ua/encyclopedia-ofplants/coniferous/show/2785
16. Thuja. (2025). Priroda Kiev. Retrieved April 3, 2025 from https://www.priroda.kiev.ua/tovar/tuja-brabant-jekstra-5
17. Boxwood. (2025). Wikipedia. Retrieved April 3, 2025 from https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Самшит
18. Buxus sempervirens Suffruticosa – Dwarf Common Boxwood. (2025). Promesse de Fleurs. Retrieved April 3, 2025 from https://www.promessedefleurs.ie/shrubs/shrubs-by-variety/buxus-boxwood/buxus-sempervirens-suffruticosa-dwarf-common-boxwood.html
19. Crocuses: Varieties, planting, and care. (2025). Lenta.ru. Retrieved January 3, 2025 from https://lenta.ru/articles/2024/08/13/krokusy-sorta-posadka-i-uhod
Review
For citations:
Dauletkhanova Y.R., Aktymbayeva A.S., Sapiyeva A.Z. Urban ecotourism development: the case of the «MAZE» Ecopark in Oskemen. Central Asian Economic Review. 2025;(4):162-178. https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2025-4-162-178














