Structural imbalances in the global uranium market and their political implications

Purpose – This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the global uranium market and assesses the ability of future supplies to meet growing demand through 2050. The study aims to identify potential imbalances between projected uranium supply and demand, taking into account market and geopolitical factors.

Methodology – The study is based on a comprehensive approach that combines econometric analysis and uranium supply curve modeling. Econometric analysis uses a variety of methods to examine the correlation between prices and production volumes, ensuring the reliability of the results. Supply curve modeling shows how uranium availability will change with price changes, allowing for an assessment of market stability under different scenarios.

Originality / value – The study analyzes the International Atomic Energy Agency’s forecasts and shows that primary uranium production will remain the main resource, despite the contribution from secondary sources. The study also highlights the importance of reviewing production and export policies in uranium-rich countries and ensuring security of supply.

Findings – The main conclusion is that a significant imbalance between the projected uranium demand and supply, especially under medium and high demand scenarios, indicates that a potential shortage may arise by 2035. Kazakhstan is expected to take a leading position in the uranium export market by 2050. In addition, political and energy security issues may contribute to the growth of demand for nuclear energy, leading to the formation of new global partnerships and trade routes. The conclusions provide a deep understanding of market dynamics and contribute to the sustainable development of nuclear energy.

1. MAGATE. (2024). Yadernaya energetika v centre vnimaniya COP29, poskol'ku strany i kompanii ishchut resheniya dlya bor'by s izmeneniem klimata. IAEA. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/nuclear-power-in-the-cop29-spotlight-as-countries-and-companies-eye-climate-solutions.

2. Bloomberg. (2023). Palata predstavitelej SShA odobryaet zapret na import rossijskogo urana. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-11/us-house-approves-russianuranium-import-ban-sending-to-senate.

3. Tharoor, I. (2023). Perevorot v Nigere privlekaet vnimanie k uranu strany. The Washington Post. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/08/01/uranium-niger-france-coup/.

4. MAGATE. (2023). Yadernaya energetika tvorit istoriyu, poskol'ku okonchatel'noe soglashenie COP28 prizyvaet k bolee bystremu razvertyvaniyu. IAEA. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/nuclear-energy-makes-history-as-final-cop28-agreement-calls-for-faster-deployment.

5. NEA, IAEA. (2022). Uran 2022: resursy, proizvodstvo i spros. Paris: OECD Publishing. – № 11. – 101-111

6. Torebaeva, M. (2021, September 21). Pochemu proizvodstvo urana snizhaetsya, a cena rastet. Cronos Asia. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://cronos.asia/ekonomika/pochemu-dobycha-urana-sokrashhaetsya-acena-letit-vverh.

7. Groves, G. L. R. (2009). Now it Can be Told: The Story of the Manhattan Project. New York: Da Capo Press. -2022. –141-145

8. World Nuclear Association. (2023). Uranium Production Figures, 2013-2022. World Nuclear Association Reports. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/facts-and-figures/uranium-production-figures

9. AO «NAK Kazatomprom». (2024). Otchet «Investor Handout». Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://www.kazatomprom.kz/storage/6b/kap_investor_handout_31012025wgelrpmkbrptwidg3lrhr.pdf.

10. Kazatomprom zavershit stroitel'stvo urana v 2021 godu. (2019, August 20). Vlast.kz. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://vlast.kz/novosti/34890-kazatomprom-prodolzit-sokrasat-dobycu-urana-v2021-godu.html.

11. Dahl, C. (2009). Elastichnost' sprosa i predlozheniya energii. Energeticheskaya politika, 72. – 2009. – № 72. – 80-84.

12. Graham, E. G. (2013). Izvrashchennaya reakciya predlozheniya v gornodobyvayushchem sektore Liberii. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6663. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6663.

13. Trieu, L. H., Savage, E., Dwyer, G. (1994). Model' mirovogo rynka urana. Energy Policy, 22(4), 317– 329. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90006-X.

14. UxC. (2024). Perspektivy rynka urana. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://www.uxc.com/p/product/report/umo.

15. Schneider, E. A., Sailor, W. C. (2007). Ocenki dolgosrochnykh postavok urana. Texas University at Austin and Los Alamos National Laboratory. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.13182/NT08-A3963

16. AO «NAK Kazatomprom». (2023). Konsolidirovannyj godovoj otchet. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://www.kazatomprom.kz/storage/bd/book_2023_kap_fin_ru.pdf.

17. Sharipova, S. E. (2024). Razrabotka nejronnoj seti dlya prognozirovaniya vliyaniya fosfora na urozhajnost' yarovoj pshenicy: doktoral'naia dissertaciya. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://surl.li/eljyxh.

18. Statista. (2024). Potreblenie urana v stranakh-liderakh. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://www. statista.com/statistics/264796/uranium-consumption-leading-countries/.