Preview

Central Asian Economic Review

Advanced search

IMPACT OF ECONOMIC IDENTITY ON INTEGRATION PROCESSES IN CENTRAL ASIA: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS

https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2024-4-172-185

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of economic identity on regional integration processes in Central Asia and to identify the key challenges and prospects associated with these processes.

Methodology. To achieve the stated goal, we apply a comprehensive approach that includes quantitative and qualitative methods, as well as comparative analysis. Quantitative analysis is based on statistical data on the trade and economic indicators of Central Asian countries obtained from international and national sources. Qualitative analysis relies on political and economic documents related to integration processes in the region. Comparative analysis is used to identify common and specific aspects of the economic identity of the countries in the region and their impact on integration processes. The criteria for selecting the research approach include the relevance of the method for studying economic identity, the possibility of obtaining reliable and

Originality/Value of the research. The originality/value of the study lies in a comprehensive approach to the study of economic identity and its impact on integration processes in Central Asia, which has not previously received sufficient coverage in the scientific literature. The value of the research is manifested in identifying the relationship between economic identity and regional integration, which can contribute to the development of more effective strategies aimed at deepening integration processes in the region.

Research Results. The study shows the significant impact of economic identity on integration processes in Central Asia. It identifies the obstacles and opportunities for the development of regional integration, as well as key factors contributing to successful integration. Recommendations have been developed to optimize integration processes considering the economic identity of the countries in the region.

About the Authors

S. Y. Umirzakov
Narxoz University
Kazakhstan

Almaty



I. N. Krengauz
Turan University
Kazakhstan

Almaty



A. A. Aubakirova
Narxoz University
Kazakhstan

Almaty



References

1. Breslin, S., & Hook, G. (Eds.). (2002). Microregionalism and world order. Basingstoke. – 263 p.

2. Buzan, B., & Waever, O. (2010). Regions and powers: The structure of international security (7th ed.). New York. – 570 p.

3. Fawcett, L. (2005). Regionalism from historical perspective. In M. Farrell, B. Hettne, & L. Langenhove(Eds.), Global politics of regionalism: Theory and practice (pp. 21-25). London.

4. Fawcett, L. (2004). Exploring regional domains: A comparative history of regionalism. International Aff airs, 80(3), 429–446.

5. Foqué, R., & Steenbergen, J. (Eds.). (2005). Regionalism: A constitutional framework for globalchallenges? In M. Farwell, B. Hettne, & L. Langenhove (Eds.), Global politics of regionalism: Theory and practice (pp. 287-304). London.

6. Kelly, R. E. (2007). Security theory in the “new regionalism.” International Studies Review, 9(2), 197229.

7. Perrin, T. (2012). New regionalism and cultural policies: Distinctive and distinguishing strategies, fromlocal to global. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 20(4), 459-475.

8. Brigevich, A. (2018). Regional identity and support for integration: An EU-wide comparison ofparochialists, inclusive regionalists, and pseudo-exclusivists. European Union Politics, 19(4), 639-662.

9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518793708

10. Felgenhauer, T., Mihm, M., & Schlottmann, A. (2005). The making of “Mitteldeutschland” on thefunction of implicit and explicit symbolic features for implementing regions and regional identity. Geografi ska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 87(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2005.00177.x 10. Harrison, J. (2006). Re-reading the new regionalism: A sympathetic critique. Space & Polity, 10(1), 21-46.

11. Dadabaev, T. (2013). Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) regional identity formation from theperspective of the Central Asian states. Journal of Contemporary China, 23, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2013.809982

12. Burnashev, R. (2019). Vzglyad na regionalizaciyu Central'noj Azii s tochki zreniya bezopasnosti.Regionalizaciya v Central'noj Azii. Strategiya Kazahstana. Almaty: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. – S. 17-27.

13. Chukubaev, E. S., & Kydyrbekova, B. S. (2012). Regionalizm i regionalizaciya Central'noj Azii.Bulletin KazNU. Series of International Relations and International Law, 1(57), 15-20.

14. Novosel'skij, G. Y., & Temkina, I. M. (2013). Sovremennye traktovki integracionnogo processa vCentral'noj Azii: analiz i prognoz. Vulletin USAES. Science. Education. Economy. Series: Economy, 1(3), 18-24.

15. Qoraboyev, I., & Moldashev, K. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative and comprehensive regionalism in Central Asia. In M. Mayer (Ed.), Rethinking the Silk Road (pp. 115-130).

16. Vinokurov, E. YU., Libman, A. M., & Maksimchuk, N. V. (2010). Dinamika integracionnyh processovv Central'noj Azii. Evrazijskaya ekonomicheskaya integraciya, 2(7), 5-32.

17. Broadman, H. G. (2000). From disintegration to reintegration: Eastern Europe and the formerSoviet Union in international trade. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved July 26, 2024, from https:// openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/aa432f85-42d3-595e-a185-f2c1c6bdbcb6

18. Dowling, J. M., & Rana, P. B. (2010). Asia and the global economic crisis: Challenges in a fi nancially integrated world. Palgrave Macmillan London. – 271 p.

19. Rumer, B., & Zhukov, S. (2017). Broader parameters: Development in the twentieth century. In CentralAsia. Routledge. – P. 57-69.

20. Park, J., Pempel, T. J., & Kim, H. (2011). Regionalism, economic integration and security in Asia: A political economy approach. Edward Elgar Publishing. – 181 p.

21. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Simon & Schuster. NewYork: The Free Press. – 457 p.

22. Collier, P. (2000). Economic causes of civil confl ict and their implications for policy. World Bank. – 23 p.

23. Pomfret, R. (2019). The Central Asian economies in the twenty-first century: Paving a new Silk Road. Princeton University Press. – 306 p.

24. Tang, S. (2000). Economic integration in Central Asia: The Russian and Chinese relationship. Asian Survey, 40(2), 360-376. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2000.40.2.01p00737

25. Baydarov, E. (2024). Barriers and bridges to the formation of regional identity in Central Asia. Retrieved July 26, 2024, from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/central-asia-a-new-hub-of-global-integration/

26. Tokaev, K. K. (2024). Vystuplenie na zasedanii Soveta glav gosudarstv-chlenov SHanhajskoj organizacii sotrudnichestva 05.07 2024. Retrieved July 26, 2024, from https://www.akorda.kz/ru/

27. Dash, P. L. (2012). India and Central Asia: Two decades of transition. Oxford University Press. – 232 p.


Review

For citations:


Umirzakov S.Y., Krengauz I.N., Aubakirova A.A. IMPACT OF ECONOMIC IDENTITY ON INTEGRATION PROCESSES IN CENTRAL ASIA: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS. Central Asian Economic Review. 2024;(4):172-185. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2024-4-172-185

Views: 176


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2789-4398 (Print)
ISSN 2789-4401 (Online)