caerCentral Asian Economic ReviewCentral Asian Economic Review2789-43982789-4401Университет Нархоз10.52821/2789-4401-2021-6-116-124caer-459Research ArticleГОСУДАРСТВО И БИЗНЕС: ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА УПРАВЛЕНИЯSTATE AND BUSINESS: THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MANAGEMENTЦЕННОСТЬ В УПРАВЛЕНИИ ПРОЕКТАМИ: НОВЫЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ В ТЕОРИИ И ПРАКТИКЕVALUE IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: NEW DIRECTIONS IN THEORY AND PRACTICEhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2751-2538УзаковаШ. Т.UzakovaS. T.

Алматы

Uzakova Shynar Tileuberdievna – PhD student

Almaty

shynar82@yahoo.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3970-6740ШильдибековЕ. Ж.ShildibekovY. Z.

Алматы

Shildibekov Erlan Zharzhanovich – PhD in Project Management, Head of Department

Almaty

y.shildibekov@iitu.kzSatbayev UniversityКазахстанSatbayev UniversityKazakhstanМеждународный университет информационных технологийКазахстанInternational IT UniversityKazakhstan20213103202206116124Copyright © Узакова Ш.Т., Шильдибеков Е.Ж., 20222022Узакова Ш.Т., Шильдибеков Е.Ж.Uzakova S.T., Shildibekov Y.Z.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://caer.narxoz.kz/jour/article/view/459

Цель исследования. Цель данной работы – проанализировать, что такое ценность в управлении проектами, как она измеряется и рассмотреть, что говорит стандарт относительно этой новой области интереса в управлении проектами.Методология. Кабинетное исследование проводилось путем применения обзора литературы и анализа Руководства к Своду знаний по управлению проектами (PMBOK) [1].Оригинальность / ценность исследования. Ценность данной работы заключается в обогащении понимания управления ценностью проекта путем применения концепций из общей теории ценности и управления проектами.Выводы. Результаты исследования свидетельствуют о том, что в новом 7-м издании PMBOK ценность добавлена в качестве одного из 12 принципов, однако отсутствует информация о том, как она может быть создана и оценена на различных этапах проектов. Отсутствуют универсальные методы измерения ценности проектов как на практике, так и в PMBOK, а также метод определения и измерения нематериальной ценности.

The purpose of this research is to analyze what is the value in project management, how it is measures and to consider what the standard says regarding this new field of interest in project management.Methodology. Desk research was carried out by applying the literature review and analyzing the Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) [1].Originality / value of the research. The value of this paper lies in the enrichment of the understanding of project value management by applying concepts from general value theory and project management.Findings. The research findings suggests that value added to the new 7th edition of PMBOK as one of the 12 principles but there is no information regarding how it can be created at different stages of the project and assessed. There is no universal value measurement methods of projects both in practice and in PMBOK as well as there is no method for determination and measuring intangible value.

управление проектамиценностьPMBOKизмерение ценности проектасовместное создание ценностиproject managementvaluePMBOKproject value measurementCo-creation of valueReferencesGuide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). – 7th edition. – Project Management Institute, Inc., 2021. – 250 p.Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) 7th edition. (2021). Project Management Institute, Inc., 250 p.Comparison of management approaches during the last 12 months [Electronic resource] // Google Trend [website]. – 2021. – URL: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=value%20based%20management,project%20based%20management,people%20based%20management,process%20based%20management (Accessed: 20.12.2021).Comparison of management approaches during the last 12 months. (2021). Google Trend. Retrieved December 20, 2021, from https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=value%20based%20management,project%20based%20management,people%20based%20management,process%20based%20management.Kaufman J. J. Value management: Creating competitive advantage. – Thomson Crisp Learning, 1998. – 96 p.Kaufman, J. J. (1998). Value management: Creating competitive advantage. Thomson Crisp Learning, 96 p.Woodruff R. Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage // Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. – 1997. – № 25(2). – P. 139-153.Woodruff , R. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139-153.Haddadi A., et al. The Concept of Value for Owners and Users of Buildings- A literature study of value in different contexts // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. – 2016. – № 226. – P. 381-389. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.202.Haddadi, A. and et al. (2016). The Concept of Value for Owners and Users of Buildings – A literature study of value in different contexts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, 381-389, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.202.Haddadi A., Johansen A., Andersen B. A Conceptual Framework to Enhance Value Creation in Construction Projects // Procedia Computer Science. – 2016. – № 100. – P. 565-573. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.196.Haddadi, A., Johansen, A. and Andersen, B. (2016). A Conceptual Framework to Enhance Value Creation in Construction Projects. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 565-573, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.196.Fuentes M. E. G. Co-creation and co-destruction of experiential value: a service perspective in projects // Built Environment Project and Asset Management. – 2019. – № 9(1). – P. 100-117. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-02-2018-0052.Fuentes, M. E. G. (2019). Co-creation and co-destruction of experiential value: a service perspective in projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(1), 100-117, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-02-2018-0052.Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012 [Electronic resource] // Legislation.gov.uk [website]. – 2012. – URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/3/enacted (Accessed: 21.12.2021).Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012. (2012). Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved December 21, 2021, from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/3/enacted.Maddaloni F., Davis K. The influence of local community stakeholders in megaprojects: Rethinking their inclusiveness to improve project performance // International Journal of Project Management. – 2017. – № 35(8). – P. 1537-1556.Maddaloni, F. and Davis, K. (2017). The influence of local community stakeholders in megaprojects: Rethinking their inclusiveness to improve project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1537-1556.Chih Y.-Y., Zwikael O., Restubog S. L. D. Enhancing value co-creation in professional service projects: The roles of professionals, clients and their effective interactions // International Journal of Project Management. – 2019. – № 37(5). – P. 599-615. – DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.04.001.Chih, Y.-Y., Zwikael, O. and Restubog, S. L. D. (2019). Enhancing value co-creation in professional service projects: The roles of professionals, clients and their effective interactions. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 599-615, DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.04.001.Vuorinen L., Martinsuo M., Value-oriented stakeholder influence on infrastructure projects // International Journal of Project Management. – 2019. – № 37(5). – P. 750-766. – DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.003.Vuorinen, L. and Martinsuo, M. (2019). Value-oriented stakeholder influence on infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 750-766, DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.003.Matinheikki J. Artto K., Peltokorpi A., Rajala R. Managing inter-organizational networks for value creation in the front-end of projects // International Journal of Project Management. – 2016. – № 34(7). – P. 1226-1241. – DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.003.Matinheikki, J. Artto, K., Peltokorpi, A. and Rajala, R. (2016). Managing inter-organizational networks for value creation in the front-end of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1226-1241, DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.003.Smyth H., Lecoeuvre L., Vaesken P. Co-creation of value and the project context: Towards application on the case of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station // International Journal of Project Management. – 2018. – № 36(1). – P. 170-183. – DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.013.Smyth, H., Lecoeuvre, L. and Vaesken, P. (2018). Co-creation of value and the project context: Towards application on the case of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 170-183, DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.013.Liu Y., Marrewijk A. H. V., Houwing E.-J., Hertogh M. The co-creation of values-in-use at the front end of infrastructure development programs // International Journal of Project Management. – 2019. – № 37(5). – P. 684-695. – DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.013.Liu, Y., Marrewijk, A., V., Houwing, E, J. and Hertogh, M. (2019). The co-creation of values-in-use at the front end of infrastructure development programs. International Journal of Project Management, 37, 684–695, DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.013.Ende L., Marrewijk A. Teargas, taboo and transformation: A neo-institutional study of community resistance and the struggle to legitimize subway projects in Amsterdam 1960–2018 // International Journal of Project Management. – 2019. – № 37(2). – P. 331-346.Ende, L. and Marrewijk, A. Teargas, taboo and transformation: A neo-institutional study of community resistance and the struggle to legitimize subway projects in Amsterdam 1960–2018. International Journal of Project Management, 37 (2), 331-346.Nardelli G., Broumels M. Managing innovation processes through value co-creation: a process casefrom business-to-business service practice // International Journal of in novation Management. – 2018. – № 22(3). – Article number: 1850030. – DOI:10.1142/S1363919618500305.Nardelli, G. and Broumels, M (2018). Managing innovation processes through value co-creation: a process casefrom business-to-business service practise. International Journal of In novation Management, 22(3), 1850030, DOI:10.1142/S1363919618500305Ribeiro H. C. M., Tavares V. C. M., Costa B. K. Value co-creation: a bibliometric from 2000 to 2014 // Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios. – 2016. – № 9(1). – P. 118-151.Ribeiro, H. C. M., Tavares, V. C. M. and Costa, B. K. (2016). Value co-creation: a bibliometric from 2000 to 2014. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 9(1), 118-151.Nájera-Sanchez J. J., Ortiz de Urbina M., Mora-Valentin E. M. Mapping Value Co-Creation. Literature in the Technology and Innovation Management Field: A Bibliographic Coupling Analysis // Frontiers in Psychology. – 2020. – № 11. – Article number 588648. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588648.Nájera-Sanchez, J. J., Ortiz de Urbina, M. and Mora-Valentin, E. M. (2020). Mapping Value CoCreation. Literature in the Technology and Innovation Management Field: A Bibliographic Coupling Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 588648, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588648.Fujiwara D., Dass D. Measuring social value in infrastructure projects: insights from the public sector. – 1st edition. – London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), 2020. – 60 p.Fujiwara, D. and Dass, D. (2020). Measuring social value in infrastructure projects: insights from the public sector. 1st edition. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), London, 60 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.