caerCentral Asian Economic ReviewCentral Asian Economic Review2789-43982789-4401Университет Нархозcaer-152Research ArticleЭКОНОМИКА ИННОВАЦИЙINNOVATION ECONOMICSПРЕДИКТОРЫ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКОЙ ПРОДУКТИВНОСТИ: ЭФФЕКТИВНЫ ЛИ ТРЕНИНГИ ДЛЯ УЧЕНЫХ?PREDICTORS OF THE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY: ARE TRAININGS FOR SCIENTISTS EFFECTIVE?МолдашевК.MoldashevK.

PhD, Исследователь

Алматы

PhD, Researcher

Almaty

КожахметС.KozhahmetS.

PhD, Профессор-Исследователь

Алматы

PhD, Research Professor

Almaty

ЕникееваА.YenikeevaA.

Докторант

Астана

Doctoral student

Astana

НургабдешовА.NurgabdeshovA.

PhD, Профессор-Исследователь

Алматы

PhD, Research Professor

Almaty

Университет НархозКазахстанNarxoz UniversityKazakhstanНазарбаев УниверситетКазахстанNazarbayev UniversityKazakhstan20192806201903122132Copyright © Молдашев К., Кожахмет С., Еникеева А., Нургабдешов А., 20192019Молдашев К., Кожахмет С., Еникеева А., Нургабдешов А.Moldashev K., Kozhahmet S., Yenikeeva A., Nurgabdeshov A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://caer.narxoz.kz/jour/article/view/152

Цель исследования – Изучение предикторов исследовательской продуктивности, включая переменныемедиаторы и переменные-модераторыМетодология – Была разработана и теоретически обоснована модель, которая включает такие переменные как исследовательская уверенность, исследовательские тренинги и климат обмена знаниями.Для сбора данных применялось анкетирование.Оригинальность/ценность – Работа вносит вклад в понимание малоизученных факторов-медиаторов и модераторов в связи между инструментами по развитию человеческих ресурсов и исследовательской продуктивностью. Работа также имеет практическое значение для администраторов в сфере науки.Выводы – Результаты исследования показывают, что научные тренинги позитивно влияют на продуктивность ученых, но их недостаточно для получения высокого позитивного эффекта. Администрациям вузов необходимо акцентировать внимание на улучшении климата, где ученые свободно делятся своими знаниями.

Purpose – To study predictors of research productivity, including mediator and moderator variables.Methodology – A model that consists of such variables as research self-efficacy research training and the knowledge sharing climate in an organization was developed and tested. Data was collected using questionnaires.Originality/value – The paper contributes to an understanding of mediator and moderator factors in the relationship between human resource development practices and research productivity. The research is also of practical importance to administrators in the field of science.Findings – The results of the study show that scientific training positively affects the productivity of scientists, but they are not enough to obtain a high positive effect. University administrations need to focus on improving the climate, where scientists freely share their knowledge.

исследовательская продуктивностьисследовательская уверенностьтренингиклимат обмена знаниямиразвитие наукиresearch productivityresearch self-efficacytrainingsknowledge sharing climatedevelopment of scienceДанная статья опубликована в рамках проекта «Интеграция исследователей в глобальное научное сообщество: Проблемы и пути решения на примере Казахстана» (ИРН № AP05133888) по приоритету: Научные основы «Мәнгілік ел» (образование XXI века, фундаментальные и прикладные научные исследования в области гуманитарных науках) грантового финансирования научных проектов по бюджетной программе 217 "развитие науки", подпрограмме 102 "Грантовое финансирование научных исследований", специфике 156.ReferencesBillot J. The changing research context: implications for leadership // J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 2010. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 37–46.Billot J. The changing research context: implications for leadership // J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 2010. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 37–46.Hemmings B., Kay R. The relationship between research self-efficacy, research disposition and publication output // Educ Psychol Rev. 2016. Vol. 36, № 2. P. 347–361.Hemmings B., Kay R. The relationship between research self-efficacy, research disposition and publication output // Educ Psychol Rev. 2016. Vol. 36, № 2. P. 347–361.Молдашев К., Тлеуов А., Радько Н. Экономика публикационного режима и проблемы интеграции Казахстанских ученых в глобальное научное сообщество // Cent. Asian Econ. Rev. 2018. Vol. 4, № 122. P. 128–138.Молдашев К., Тлеуов А., Радько Н. Экономика публикационного режима и проблемы интегра ции Казахстанских ученых в глобальное научное сообщество // Cent. Asian Econ. Rev. 2018. Vol. 4, № 122. P. 128–138.Karatayev M. Kazakhstan’s Science in the World: Looking at trends in scholarly publishing [Electronic resource] // Creative Research Methods Lab. 2016. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzN90tqAsbRNUNVR0dhcXJrUlU/view.Karatayev M. Kazakhstan’s Science in the World: Looking at trends in scholarly publishing [Electronic resource] // Creative Research Methods Lab. 2016. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzN90tqAsbRNUNVR0dhcXJrUlU/view.Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access // Nature. 2012. Vol. 489, № 7415. P. 179–179.Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access // Nature. 2012. Vol. 489, № 7415. P. 179–179.Van den H.B., Ridder J.A. Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing // J. Knowl. Manag. 2004. Vol. 8, № 6. P. 117–130.Van den H.B., Ridder J.A. Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing // J. Knowl. Manag. 2004. Vol. 8, № 6. P. 117–130.Cohen E., Cohen S.A., King V.T. The global permutations of the Western publication regime // Curr Issues Tour. 2016. P. 1–17.Cohen E., Cohen S.A., King V.T. The global permutations of the Western publication regime // Curr Issues Tour. 2016. P. 1–17.Macdonald S., Kam J. Ring a Ring o? Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies // J Manag. Stud. 2007. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 640–655.Macdonald S., Kam J. Ring a Ring o? Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies // J Manag. Stud. 2007. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 640–655.Lucas L. Research Game in Academic Life. 2006.Lucas L. Research Game in Academic Life. 2006.Kwok L.S. The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism // J. Med. Ethics. 2005. Vol. 31, № 9. P. 554–556.Kwok L.S. The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism // J. Med. Ethics. 2005. Vol. 31, № 9. P. 554–556.Kovacs J. Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citationbased evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article // J. Med. Ethics. 2013. Vol. 39, № 8. P. 509–512.Kovacs J. Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citationbased evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article // J. Med. Ethics. 2013. Vol. 39, № 8. P. 509–512.Beerkens M. Facts and fads in academic research management: The effect of management practices on research productivity in Australia // Res. Policy. 2013. Vol. 42, № 9. P. 1679–1693.Beerkens M. Facts and fads in academic research management: The effect of management practices on research productivity in Australia // Res. Policy. 2013. Vol. 42, № 9. P. 1679–1693.Holton E.F., Swanson R.A. Foundations of Human Resource Development. Bernett Koehler Publishers, 2009. 586 p.Holton E.F., Swanson R.A. Foundations of Human Resource Development. Bernett Koehler Publishers, 2009. 586 p.Cropanzano R., Mitchell M.S. Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review // J. Manag. 2005. Vol. 31, № 6. P. 874–900.Cropanzano R., Mitchell M.S. Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review // J. Manag. 2005. Vol. 31, № 6. P. 874–900.Phillips J.C., Russell R.K. Research Self-Efficacy, the Research Training Environment, and Research Productivity among Graduate Students in Counseling Psychology // Couns. Psychol. 1994. Vol. 22, № 4. P. 628–641.Phillips J.C., Russell R.K. Research Self-Efficacy, the Research Training Environment, and Research Productivity among Graduate Students in Counseling Psychology // Couns. Psychol. 1994. Vol. 22, № 4. P. 628–641.Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency // Am. Psychol. 1982. Vol. 37, № 2. P. 122–147.Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency // Am. Psychol. 1982. Vol. 37, № 2. P. 122–147.Lambie G.W., Vaccaro N. Doctoral Counselor Education Students’ Levels of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment, and Interest in Research // Couns. Educ. Superv. 2011. Vol. 50, № 4. P. 243–258.Lambie G.W., Vaccaro N. Doctoral Counselor Education Students’ Levels of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment, and Interest in Research // Couns. Educ. Superv. 2011. Vol. 50, № 4. P. 243–258.Wang S., Noe R.A. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research // Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2010. Vol. 20, № 2. P. 115–131.Wang S., Noe R.A. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research // Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2010. Vol. 20, № 2. P. 115–131.Connelly C.E. et al. Knowledge hiding in organizations // J. Organ. Behav. 2012. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 64–88.Connelly C.E. et al. Knowledge hiding in organizations // J. Organ. Behav. 2012. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 64–88.Meyer J.P., Allen N.J., Smith C.A. Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization // J. Appl. Psychol. 1993. Vol. 78, № 4. P. 538–551.Meyer J.P., Allen N.J., Smith C.A. Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization // J. Appl. Psychol. 1993. Vol. 78, № 4. P. 538–551.Holden L. et al. Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels // Aust. J. Prim. Health. 2012. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 62–67.Holden L. et al. Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels // Aust. J. Prim. Health. 2012. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 62–67.Connelly C.E., Kevin K.E. Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures // Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2003. Vol. 24, № 5. P. 294–301.Connelly C.E., Kevin K.E. Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures // Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2003. Vol. 24, № 5. P. 294–301.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.