caerCentral Asian Economic ReviewCentral Asian Economic Review2789-43982789-4401Университет Нархоз10.52821/2789-4401-2025-3-81-90caer-1491Research ArticleБИЗНЕС И УПРАВЛЕНИЕ: ПРОБЛЕМЫ И РЕШЕНИЯBUSINESS AND GOVERNANCE: ISSUES AND SOLUTIONSУниверситетско-промышленное партнерство как фактор инновационного роста электронной промышленности КазахстанаUniversity-industry partnership as a driver of innovative growth in Kazakhstan’s electronics industryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4787-2028ХасеноваК. К.KhasenovaK. K.

Хасенова Кенжегуль Калмуратовна – кандидат экономических наук, ассоциированный профессор 

Астана

Almaty 

n_kenzhegul@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0009-0007-6203-2285МухамеджановЖ. У.MukhamejanovZh. U.

Мухамеджанов Жанибек Умарбекулы – докторант Ph.D. 

Астана

Almaty 

zhanibekmukhamejanov@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-3568ДосжанР. Д.DoszhanR. D.

Досжан Райгуль Дүкенбайқызы – PhD, ассоциированный профессор 

Алматы

Almaty 

raiguldos2011@gmail.comЕвразийский национальный университет им. Л.Н. ГумилеваКазахстанL.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National UniversityKazakhstanКазахский национальный университет им. Аль-ФарабиКазахстанAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityKazakhstan202514082025038190Copyright © Хасенова К.К., Мухамеджанов Ж.У., Досжан Р.Д., 20252025Хасенова К.К., Мухамеджанов Ж.У., Досжан Р.Д.Khasenova K.K., Mukhamejanov Z.U., Doszhan R.D.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://caer.narxoz.kz/jour/article/view/1491

Целью настоящего исследования является системный анализ международных моделей взаимодействия университетов и промышленности (UIC) с акцентом на оценку их применимости в условиях электронной промышленности Республики Казахстан. Учитывая стратегическую важность индустриализации и цифровизации экономики, эффективное университетско-промышленное сотрудничество рассматривается как ключевой фактор развития научно-технологического потенциала страны.Методология исследования основана на контент-анализе 17 научных публикаций, отобранных из базы данных Scopus на основе двух поисковых запросов, охватывающих как эмпирические кейсы, так и теоретико-обзорные работы. Проведено сопоставление выявленных моделей и подходов с текущим состоянием и проблемами казахстанской электронной отрасли, что позволило адаптировать зарубежный опыт к национальному контексту.Оригинальность исследования заключается в комплексной попытке связать международные теоретические и практические наработки по UIC с задачами модернизации высокотехнологичной отрасли в стране с формирующейся инновационной экосистемой. Работа восполняет пробел в литературе по адаптации UIC-моделей к отраслевому и региональному уровню в условиях развивающихся стран.В результате обоснована необходимость развития пяти ключевых моделей UIC — совместных лабораторий, Living Labs, посреднических структур, международного сотрудничества и государственных программ — и предложены конкретные направления их реализации в Казахстане. Выводы исследования могут быть использованы при формировании государственной политики, стратегии университетов и планировании совместных инициатив с бизнесом.

The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic analysis of international models of university–industry collaboration (UIC), with a particular focus on assessing their applicability in the context of the electronics industry in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Considering the strategic importance of industrialization and the digitalization of the economy, effective university–industry cooperation is viewed as a key factor in the development of the country’s scientific and technological potential.The research methodology is based on content analysis of 17 academic publications selected from the Scopus database through two search queries, covering both empirical cases and theoretical reviews. The identified models and approaches were compared with the current state and challenges of Kazakhstan’s electronics sector, allowing for the adaptation of international experience to the national context.The originality of this study lies in its comprehensive attempt to link international theoretical and practical developments in UIC with the modernization tasks of a high-tech sector within a country possessing a developing innovation ecosystem. The paper fills a gap in the literature on adapting UIC models to industryspecific and regional levels in the context of emerging economies.As a result, the study substantiates the need to develop five key UIC models — joint laboratories, Living Labs, intermediary structures, international collaboration, and government-driven programs — and proposes specific directions for their implementation in Kazakhstan. The findings can be used in shaping public policy, university strategies, and planning joint initiatives with business.

университетско-промышленное взаимодействиеинновационное развитиеэлектронная промышленностьКазахстанмодели UICтрансфер технологийuniversity–industry collaborationinnovation developmentelectronics industryKazakhstanUIC modelstechnology transferReferencesHou B., Hong J., Wang H., Zhou C. Academia–industry collaboration, government funding and innovation efficiency in Chinese industrial enterprises // Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. – 2018. – P. 1–17. – DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2018.1543868.Hou, B., Hong, J., Wang, H., & Zhou, C. (2018). Academia–industry collaboration, government funding and innovation efficiency in Chinese industrial enterprises. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1543868Shvetsova O.A., Lee S.-K. Living Labs in University–Industry Cooperation as a Part of Innovation Ecosystem: Case Study of South Korea // Sustainability. – 2021. – 13(11). – 5793. – DOI: 10.3390/su13115793.Shvetsova, O. A., & Lee, S.-K. (2021). Living Labs in university–industry cooperation as a part of innovation ecosystem: Case study of South Korea. Sustainability, 13(11), 5793. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115793Мухамеджанов Ж.У., Хасенова К.К., Нурпеисова Н.С., Макишева Ж.А. Роль государства в инновационном развитии электронной промышленности Казахстана // Вестник Казахского университета экономики, финансов и международной торговли. – 2024. – № 2(55). – DOI: 10.52260/2304-7216.2024.2(55).27.Mukhamedzhanov, Zh. U., Khasenova, K. K., Nurpeisova, N. S., & Makisheva, Zh. A. (2024). Rol' gosudarstva v innovatsionnom razvitii elektronnoi promyshlennosti Kazakhstana [The role of the state in the innovation development of the electronic industry of Kazakhstan]. Vestnik Kazakhskogo Universiteta Ekonomiki, Finansov i Mezhdunarodnoĭ Torgovli, 2(55). https://doi.org/10.52260/2304-7216.2024.2(55).27Mahdad M., Minh T.T., Bogers M., Piccaluga A. Joint university–industry laboratories through the lens of proximity dimensions: Moving beyond geographical proximity // International Journal of Innovation Science. – 2020. – 12(4). – P. 433–456. – DOI: 10.1108/IJIS-10-2019-0096.Mahdad, M., Minh, T. T., Bogers, M., & Piccaluga, A. (2020). Joint university–industry laboratories through the lens of proximity dimensions: Moving beyond geographical proximity. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(4), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2019-0096Cirella S., Murphy S. Exploring intermediary practices of collaboration in university–industry innovation: A practice theory approach // Creativity and Innovation Management. – 2022. – 31(2). – P. 358–375. – DOI: 10.1111/caim.12491.Cirella, S., & Murphy, S. (2022). Exploring intermediary practices of collaboration in university–industry innovation: A practice theory approach. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(2), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12491Steinmo M., Rasmussen E. The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university–industry collaboration: Overcoming the experience barrier // Research Policy. – 2018. – 47(10). – P. 1964–1974. – DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.004.Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2018). The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university–industry collaboration: Overcoming the experience barrier. Research Policy, 47(10), 1964–1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.004Walsh J.P., Lee Y.-N., Nagaoka S. Openness and innovation in the US: Collaboration form, idea generation and implementation // Research Policy. – 2016. – 45(8). – P. 1660–1675. – DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.013.Walsh, J. P., Lee, Y.-N., & Nagaoka, S. (2016). Openness and innovation in the US: Collaboration form, idea generation and implementation. Research Policy, 45(8), 1660–1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.013Corsi S., Feranita F., Hughes M., Wilson A. Universities as Internationalization Catalysts: Reversing Roles in University–Industry Collaboration // British Journal of Management. – 2023. – 34. – P. 1992–2014. – DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12676.Corsi, S., Feranita, F., Hughes, M., & Wilson, A. (2023). Universities as internationalization catalysts: Reversing roles in university–industry collaboration. British Journal of Management, 34, 1992–2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12676Hansen I.-E., Mork O.J., Welo T. Managing Knowledge in Manufacturing Industry: University Innovation Projects // In: Ferreira J., Rammal A., Pereira A. (Eds.) Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking. – Springer, 2020. – P. 857–875. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29996-5_69.Hansen, I.-E., Mork, O. J., & Welo, T. (2020). Managing knowledge in manufacturing industry: University innovation projects. In J. Ferreira, A. Rammal, & A. Pereira (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking (pp. 857–875). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29996-5_69Chen H., Song X. Collaboration and knowledge networks: A framework on analyzing evolution of university–industry collaborative innovation // Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on AI + Informetrics (AII2021). – 2021. – URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2931/paper6.pdfChen, H., & Song, X. (2021). Collaboration and knowledge networks: A framework on analyzing evolution of university–industry collaborative innovation. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on AI + Informetrics (AII2021). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2931/paper6.pdfRossoni A.L., Vasconcellos E.P.G., Rossoni R.L.C. Barriers and facilitators of university–industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: A systematic review // Journal of Knowledge Management. – 2024. – DOI: 10.1108/JKM-11-2022-0896.Rossoni, A. L., Vasconcellos, E. P. G., & Rossoni, R. L. C. (2024). Barriers and facilitators of university– industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: A systematic review. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2022-0896Chesbrough H., Vanhaverbeke W., West J. (Eds.). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press.Fitriasari N.S., Sensuse D.I., Hidayat D.S., Purwaningsih E.H. A systematic literature review on university collaboration in open innovation: Trends, technologies, and frameworks // The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management. – 2024. – 22(1). – P. 40–58. – URL: https://www.ejkm.comFitriasari, N. S., Sensuse, D. I., Hidayat, D. S., & Purwaningsih, E. H. (2024). A systematic literature review on university collaboration in open innovation: Trends, technologies, and frameworks. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1), 40–58. https://www.ejkm.comSkute I., Zalewska-Kurek K., Hatak I., de Weerd-Nederhof P. Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations // Journal of Technology Transfer. – 2019. – 44(3). – P. 916–947. – DOI: 10.1007/s10961-017-9637-1.Skute, I., Zalewska-Kurek, K., Hatak, I., & de Weerd-Nederhof, P. (2019). Mapping the field: A bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(3), 916–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9637-1Nsanzumuhire S.U., Groot W. Context perspective on university–industry collaboration processes: A systematic review of the literature // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2020. – 258. – 120861. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120861.Nsanzumuhire, S. U., & Groot, W. (2020). Context perspective on university–industry collaboration processes: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120861Sjöö K., Hellström T. University–industry collaboration: A literature review and synthesis // Industry and Innovation. – 2019. – 26(2). – P. 115–141. – DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2018.1412536.Sjöö, K., & Hellström, T. (2019). University–industry collaboration: A literature review and synthesis. Industry and Innovation, 26(2), 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1412536Mascarenhas C., Ferreira J.J., Marques C. University–industry cooperation: A systematic literature review and research agenda // Science and Public Policy. – 2018. – 45(6). – P. 745–758. – DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scy003.Mascarenhas, C., Ferreira, J. J., & Marques, C. (2018). University–industry cooperation: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Science and Public Policy, 45(6), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy003Wang Y., Shuib L., Norman A.A., Tajudeen F.P. The factors influencing university-driven technology transfer with SMEs: A systematic literature review // International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2024). – 2025. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29996-5_69.Wang, Y., Shuib, L., Norman, A. A., & Tajudeen, F. P. (2025). The factors influencing universitydriven technology transfer with SMEs: A systematic literature review. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29996-5_69Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations // Research Policy. – 2000. – 29(2). – P. 109–123. – DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4Hajrizi E., Berisha Shaqiri A. Mapping the evolution of university–industry collaboration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. – 2024. – DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-01688-z.Hajrizi, E., & Berisha Shaqiri, A. (2024). Mapping the evolution of university–industry collaboration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01688-z

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.